October 2014

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Randeep Hooda has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Speedy deletion nomination of Bollywood galiyara

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bollywood galiyara requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- GB fan 16:35, 28 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Formatting

edit

Hi there, though your efforts are appreciated, with regard to these changes, you made a lot of bizarre formatting choices that brought the infobox out of alignment with typical formatting. You removed {{ubl}} templates for some reason, perhaps not knowing what they are. UBL is "unbulleted list". It presents entries in an orderly fashion in the infobox. Removing the template created a jumble of names, for instance in |music=. You'll also notice that while there are 4 names indicated in |starring=, only one name appears in the formatted infobox. You also reformatted the Infobox name module template for some unclear reason. This template exists to present film titles in native script, if applicable. In this instance, the Hindi script title was being presented as an alternative, but you changed it to English. That's not helpful. You also didn't format the image correctly. In the infobox we only use the file title, not other options like embedded captions and thumbnail. You really should take a look at Template:Infobox film to get a better sense of how the infobox should be formatted, and please click show preview before saving your changes, so you can be sure that your efforts are actually improving the article. In the meantime, your changes have been reverted. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:19, 29 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Bollywood Galiyara for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bollywood Galiyara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bollywood Galiyara until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kleuske (talk) 13:00, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

This article as created to aware knowledge about the Bollywood and entertainment news, why its nominated for deletion.

March 2019

edit

  Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Manohar Parrikar. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. DBigXray 18:07, 17 March 2019 (UTC)Reply