Operation COOKIE MONSTER edit

 
In support of Operation COOKIE MONSTER (OCM) I'm presenting WikiCookies in appreciation for military service to the United States. Happy Independence Day! Ndunruh (talk) 03:47, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

MacGyver edit

I read the arguments on this page quite carefully, but felt that the balance of the arguments pointed to delete (later changed to a merge, on request from User:A Nobody), However, if you wish this decision reviewed, please feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Deletion review. I'm quite open to the idea that other admins might view these arguments differently than I did. All the best Tim Vickers (talk) 16:36, 26 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks (Detroit Lions tv and radio networks) edit

Hey thanks for your support. Tell your friends. Go Lions.TomCat4680 (talk) 19:18, 26 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

re: afd's

Yeah I realized that and I deleted them and wrote something else.TomCat4680 (talk) 19:31, 26 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Kelly Overton (actress) edit

Oh... the filmology was nice to add so as to indicate that she's a working actor... but I think the notability was cinched by the reviews about her acting and directing. Everything else is icing on the cake. Best, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q.


TomCat4680 (talk) 14:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron edit

  Hello, Raitchison. Based on the templates on your talk page, I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia. Article Rescue Members are not necessarily inclusionists, all wikipedians are warmly welcome to join.~~~~

WebCitation.org edit

Stile hack edit

Since you were one of the editors of the Stile hack/suicide advisory, here's a heads up: If you see such a hack or online event, use WebCitation.org to archive a copy of such pages in future. That way, we can use it in Wikipedia. Cheers. --Lexein (talk) 21:34, 27 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Followup RFC to WP:RFC/AAT now in community feedback phase edit

Hello. As a participant in Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Abortion article titles, you may wish to register an opinion on its followup RFC, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Abortion advocacy movement coverage, which is now in its community feedback phase. Please note that WP:RFC/AAMC is not simply a repeat of WP:RFC/AAT, and is attempting to achieve better results by asking a more narrowly-focused, policy-based question of the community. Assumptions based on the previous RFC should be discarded before participation, particularly the assumption that Wikipedia has or inherently needs to have articles covering generalized perspective on each side of abortion advocacy, and that what we are trying to do is come up with labels for that. Thanks! —chaos5023 20:31, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

affluent edit

The word "affluent" has been reinserted into the West Hills page. There was a long discussion on this over on the Sherman Oaks page, and it has stayed off that page. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sherman_Oaks,_Los_Angeles#Affluence). User DrRc had removed this once already from the West Hills page, only to see it added back in.Phatblackmama (talk) 00:36, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Raitchison This has now turned into an edit war, with 4 reverts by one user.~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:304:CD8F:C70:ECB8:C663:419:924C (talk) 15:09, 6 March 2017 (UTC)Reply