Ragulparasuram, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Ragulparasuram! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of K Sathish

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on K Sathish requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. noq (talk) 12:32, 18 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Abhishek Films

edit

Hello Ragulparasuram,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Abhishek Films for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 21:07, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Undisclosed paid editing

edit
 

Hello Ragulparasuram. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ragulparasuram. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ragulparasuram|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Failure to disclose paid editing relationships will result in your account being blocked. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:37, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply


Hi, I'm not compensated for edits. I've edited articles only for the people/company I know who are well known in the profession here Ragulparasuram (talk) 07:25, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of V. R. Nagendran for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article V. R. Nagendran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V. R. Nagendran until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TamilMirchi (talk) 20:51, 7 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2024

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Sivakarthikeyan, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

  1. Per WP:ACCESSIBILITY & MOS:TABLECAPTION, data tables should always include a descriptive caption.
  2. Per MOS:SECTIONHEAD: Section headings should be presented in sentence case.

 — Archer1234 (t·c) 07:50, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Photo of Sivakarthikeyan

edit

Hello @Ragulparasuram. Did you take the photograph you added to the article about Sivakarthikeyan? At [1] it says that it is your own work. Is that correct?  — Archer1234 (t·c) 07:58, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply