Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse! edit

 
Hello! Qwertyuiop84919, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Agnihothri Sharath (talk) 12:06, 27 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 14:07, 30 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Physics Wallah edit

Hello, Qwertyuiop84919,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Physics Wallah, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:24, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Qwertyuiop84919 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Kindly unblock me from editing, it has been 2 years since i was blocked for Sock puppetry. I was not using many accounts , as sometimes i used to delete my web history, which results in signing out of all logged in accounts, i used to edit articles without logging in as i used to forget to login. I will be upholding the wikipedia policies, rules and regulations from now. Qwertyuiop84919 (talk) 08:49, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

  Confirmed block evasion, much more recently than two years ago. Indeed, your block was only a little over a year ago. Because of this attempt to deceive us, your best bet now is to go six months with zero edits (including signed-out edits), then apply under WP:SO. You'll need to be substantially more honest at that time. Yamla (talk) 11:12, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please unblock Qwertyuiop84919 (talk) 12:28, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Six months from today is 2023-07-08. That's the first time you'd be eligible under WP:SO. --Yamla (talk) 12:33, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Unblock edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Qwertyuiop84919 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Kindly unblock me from editing, it has been 1 years since i was blocked for Sock puppetry. I was not using many accounts , as sometimes i used to delete my web history, which results in signing out of all logged in accounts, i used to edit articles without logging in as i used to forget to login. I will be upholding the wikipedia policies, rules and regulations from now. Just wanted to add I also uploaded another request for unblocking me today but it was rejected as i wrote on that i am blocked since 2 years but in reality i was blocked for a year only i was thinking as 2023 came it might mean 1more year i apolojize for that, Also you can check my all previous edits i have never been against any wikipedia policy, i really want to edit the articles and create new pages related tk my geography i.e Kashmir. Requesting you to please unblock me🙏🙏🙏🙏You can keep an eye on my account and block it if i ever got against any wikipedia policyQwertyuiop84919 (talk) 12:48, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You do not address your recent block evasion, and you have not waited six months with no edits. I am declining your request. PhilKnight (talk) 15:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I also rejected your unblock request because you've been editing far, far more recently than that. Not a year ago. Not a month ago. Within the past week. You are continuing to try to mislead us and this will count against you for WP:SO, if you ever go six months with no edits. --Yamla (talk) 12:51, 8 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Qwertyuiop84919 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I haven,t edited a single time any wikipedia page after 8 jan 2023, I am writing to request an unblock on Wikipedia as I believe my recent block was a misunderstanding or unintentional violation of the site's policies. I value Wikipedia's commitment to maintaining high standards and ensuring a positive user experience. I kindly ask you to review my contributions and reconsider the block placed on my account. I apologize for any violations or misunderstandings and assure you that I will adhere to Wikipedia's policies diligently in the future. Thank you for your time and consideration. KINDLY UNBLOCK Qwertyuiop84919 (talk) 18:49, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. You aren't eligible for unblock consideration under WP:SO until tomorrow. I wouldn't normally be a stickler about this but you attempted to deceive us before so I really think you should wait the full six months. In fact, I think you'll need to address your attempt to deceive us in any future unblock request; you failed to do so here. Yamla (talk) 19:06, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Qwertyuiop84919 (talk) 18:49, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Reconsider Block On My Account edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Qwertyuiop84919 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i apolojize for any attempt to decieve or mislead the wikipedia community.I regret any misunderstanding that may have occured and assure you transparency and honesty are important to me. I have learned from this experieence and will contribute with integrity adhering to wikipedie policies. I kindly request you to reconsider block on my account. Qwertyuiop84919 (talk) 19:00, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

These general platitudes tell us nothing. You will need to be much more specific. If honesty is important to you, why did you deceive us? 331dot (talk) 21:38, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.