User talk:QuickWittedHare/archive/June2018
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Your UAA report
Thanks for your UAA report. I feel smug for getting it sorted in the same minute you posted it. (Of course that was just luck; it turned up at the top of my watchlist.) Bishonen | talk 01:51, 10 June 2018 (UTC).
Removing warnings
Hi QuickWittedHare. Thanks for reporting the IP 112.197.202.25 to WP:AIV. I just wanted to let you know that any editor is allowed to remove warnings and messages from their own user talk page at any time, so if you warn an editor and the editor removes the warning, like the editor did at User talk:112.197.202.25, you generally don't have to undo their edit to restore the warning. The warning is still visible in the page history of the talk page, so patrolling admins can still see them and factor them into a decision to block. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 04:30, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Wdefcon
I saw your question at the Teahouse. It was somewhat more technical than we usually deal with there, so I'm willing to leave your removal alone. Usually, we prefer to leave questions in place for the presumed benefit of other readers.
As for the loops, it looks like you solved the problem by removing your examples from the template code. If you take a look at some other templates, and at Template:Documentation, you'll find that there are approaches for integrating the template code and its documentation. In your case, I think if you had placed <noinclude>
directives around the examples, that might have resolved things. The loop detector in the template handling code is really primitive (or draconian), though, so that might not be quite enough.— jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 03:10, 11 June 2018 (UTC)