Problematics

Problematics, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Problematics! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:03, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Human rights abuses in Kashmir, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 10:24, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi Jim. The reason content here has been removed is to follow the pattern set in its related page here and here. Content is not really being removed, rather its being redirected.Problematics (talk) 10:29, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Human rights abuses in Kashmir, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 10:31, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

In reference to an article, "talk", in this case refers to talk:Human rights abuses in Kashmir. Not here. Jim1138 (talk) 10:34, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Thats fine Jim. What is happening is a cleanup so tedious information is being removed and redirected to pages solely about that specific information.

Like here, on a related page. I hope you understand.Problematics (talk) 10:40, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

This is a WP:Content forking dispute at Rape in Kashmir Insurgency

Please do not add text to the article until dispute is resolved. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 15:00, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Fowler&fowler I did not add substantial text, I just made the article go back to an earlier state. User:MBlaze Lightning misunderstood and removed a source so I re-added it with an explanation. If you can apply reverts to my edits please be fair and apply it to everyone. Problematics (talk) 15:10, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I can't do it to before the protection level of the page was changed, and other housekeeping changes made, by admin Malle66. No worries, whether it stays or whether it is redirected, you will get plenty opportunities later. Best regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 15:14, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Note

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

—MBlaze Lightning ^T 13:52, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

War rape in the Kosovo War

Hi there, may thanks for your contributions. I noticed that your new article is very unfinished and has been tagged with quite a few "building site" tags. As it seems very unfinished, the article should not be in main space. I have moved it to draft. Once done, I'm happy to help review and move back to main article space. If you have any questions, pls let me know. Thanks. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 13:33, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

You are welcome Jake Brockman Problematics (talk) 20:56, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The "show preview" button is right next to the "save page" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 22:22, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Reported on ARE

Here, you can reply. Capitals00 (talk) 12:37, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

SPI

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Towns Hill. Thank you. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 21:26, 12 May 2017 (UTC)