Princepcub3
Princepcub3, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit
|
Hi Princepcub3! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:12, 11 June 2019 (UTC) |
The article Litmus7 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NCORP. Sources fail WP:CORPDEPTH
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. shoy (reactions) 13:47, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi Shoy reactions ,
Thanks for your valuable time for reviewing one of my articles. Thanks for bringing this to my notice.
Regards, Prince Paul (talk) 06:09, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Princepcub3
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Scope creep and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Litmus7, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Litmus7.
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
scope_creepTalk 16:20, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi Scope @Scope creep: ,
I have been contributing to Wikipedia for the past 4 months. My key interests are in institutions in my native. I always loved to improve articles that needed some attention. Also, I have been creating a few articles which has got authenticity and which are needed to be on Wikipedia for the greater good. Thanks for your valuable time in reviewing this article. It was created using all authentic references I got from the internet. It was not intended to create any promotion for the article subject as you can see it was written in a very basic language. My only intention was to educate common people about the companies in my native. Thanks, once again for helping me to understand how Wikipedia works on such articles.
Much gratitude, Prince Paul (talk) 06:05, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Litmus7 edit
Hello, Princepcub3. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Litmus7".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 10:00, 18 January 2020 (UTC)