Poopados

April 2024

Hello, I'm Yoshi24517. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Caitlin Clark—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 21:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Please daoaoaoaoaoaoaoao not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Walton Goggins. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 22:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 22:06, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

I am writing to respectfully request a reconsideration of the ban imposed on my Wikipedia account. I understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia’s guidelines and policies, and I deeply regret any actions that may have led to this situation. I would like to present several reasons why I believe I should be given another chance to contribute to the Wikipedia community.

1. Commitment to Improvement: I have thoroughly reviewed the reasons for my ban and have taken substantial steps to ensure that such issues will not arise in the future. I am committed to strictly following Wikipedia’s guidelines and policies henceforth.

2. Educational Purpose: Wikipedia serves as an invaluable educational resource. My primary intent has always been to contribute constructively and enhance the quality of information available to the public. I believe that with a renewed focus and adherence to the guidelines, I can make significant positive contributions.

3. Constructive Contributions: Prior to my ban, I have made numerous constructive edits and contributions to various articles. These edits were aimed at improving the accuracy, neutrality, and comprehensiveness of the information provided. I believe my history of positive contributions should be taken into consideration.

4. Learning from Mistakes: I fully acknowledge and take responsibility for the actions that led to my ban. This experience has been a valuable learning opportunity, and I am now better equipped with the knowledge of what is expected of Wikipedia editors.

5. Willingness to Collaborate: I am willing to engage with the Wikipedia community to better understand how I can improve my editing practices. I am open to constructive feedback and eager to collaborate with other editors to ensure my contributions meet Wikipedia’s high standards.

6. Positive Intentions: My intentions have always been aligned with the mission of Wikipedia – to provide free access to the sum of all human knowledge. I am passionate about knowledge-sharing and believe that with guidance and adherence to rules, I can contribute positively to this mission.

7. Commitment to Neutrality: I understand the importance of neutrality and objectivity in Wikipedia articles. I am committed to ensuring that my future contributions will be unbiased, well-sourced, and in compliance with Wikipedia’s neutrality policy.

8. Respect for Policies: I have taken the time to thoroughly read and understand Wikipedia’s policies, including those regarding verifiability, no original research, and reliable sources. I assure you that my future edits will be in strict compliance with these policies.

9. Desire to Add Value: I have a genuine desire to add value to Wikipedia by contributing high-quality content. My goal is to enrich the platform with well-researched, informative, and accurate articles that can benefit readers worldwide.

10. Community Spirit: I believe in the power of community and collective effort. Wikipedia thrives on the contributions of many, and I wish to be a part of this vibrant community again, contributing positively and helping maintain the integrity of the content.

11. Track Record of Positive Engagement: Aside from the issues leading to my ban, my overall track record shows numerous instances of positive engagement and valuable contributions. I believe this demonstrates my potential to be a constructive member of the Wikipedia community.

12. Commitment to Continuous Learning: I am committed to continuously learning and improving as a Wikipedia editor. I will actively seek out resources and engage in discussions to better understand best practices and how I can adhere to them.

13. Request for Guidance: I humbly request guidance from experienced editors and administrators on how I can improve my contributions. I am eager to learn from the community and align my editing practices with Wikipedia’s standards.

In conclusion, I respectfully request the reconsideration of my ban. I am fully committed to adhering to Wikipedia’s guidelines and contributing positively to the platform. I believe that with a renewed focus and commitment, I can be a valuable member of the Wikipedia community. Thank you for considering my appeal.

Sincerely,

Poopados (an account of American origin) Poopados (talk) 22:44, 21 June 2024 (UTC)