December 2019 edit

  Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Vaccine for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 13:23, 27 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Note edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Note that anti-vaccinationism is within the umbrella of pseudoscience. Guy (help!) 13:10, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

I disagree, if Wikipedia has a problem with representing both sides to an arguement like an encyclopedia should, it's charitable status should be revoked. PnutButr (talk) 13:15, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

PnutButr, you can disagree all you like, the above message alerts you to specific sanctions that Wikipedia applies in this area. Guy (help!) 14:32, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
We are a mainstream encyclopedia. We're biased in favor of science. Doug Weller talk 17:27, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

November 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Trayvon Martin, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Joel Gilbert clearly fails WP:RS and WP:VERIFY Doug Weller talk 14:02, 27 November 2020 (UTC)Reply