Platoniam

2014

Platoniam, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Platoniam! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:22, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Ohio Bobcats

Hi there. Please be sure to read and respond to what I wrote at Talk:Ohio Bobcats#"Notable" competitors. Also, when making any edit, even when you are simply reverting an edit, please be sure to use the edit summary to explain why you feel it should be changed. I have given explanations in my edit summaries as to why it shouldn't be included and included a section on the talk page as a courtesy. --JonRidinger (talk) 01:50, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Notable competitors etc.

I won't insult you with a 3RR template, but will note that with your 4 reverts, of two different editors, in the past day or so - and in the face of a clear Talk page consensus, you are edit warring and need to stop. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 21:49, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

I am going to add a template just because Platoniam isn't the most experienced edit count-wise, so this might be the first 3RR encounter...the warning does provide a decent summary. only (talk) 21:59, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. only (talk) 21:59, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Ohio Bobcats. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  only (talk) 00:08, 23 February 2015 (UTC)