Philosophered
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dudeskin8. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 06:43, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Blocked edit
Wikipedia doesn't accept promotion of conspiracy theories or white supremacism, especially white supremacist conspiracy theories.
That you sided with white supremacist sources such as American Renaissance (magazine) and Generation Identity, Defending Europe over mainstream sources is an indication that either:
Whatever your problem is, you are neither trusted nor welcome to edit here. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:49, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
- If you would have read my comments, I made very clear that I posted those websites to show that the people who put forth the Great Replacement theory don't necessarily believe that the replacement is deliberate. It is only a few select sources, put forth by people who don't believe the theory, that say the replacement is being done deliberately. Therefore, that part of the article needs to be modified. Philosophered (talk) 19:53, 5 February 2019 (UTC)Philosophered
Philosophered (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Administrator accused me of "white supremacy" because I attempted to edit a page on the Great Replacement (which is not even a white supremacist theory). He then proceeded to call me a "white supremacist" and inferred that I didn't know why "white supremacism [sic]" was wrong (How he was able to get all of this out of a Wikipedia edit is beyond me, and I even rebutted these charges in the talk section of this page.). I believe he is blocking me to silence my opinion on the matter. One need only to look at Ian.thompson's own user page to see why he might do so. For further information on why his accusation that I used improper sources is wrong, please see the above comment on my user page. This block should be lifted. Philosophered (talk) 20:10, 5 February 2019 (UTC)Philosophered
Decline reason:
The block is valid. The only circumstance in which I would agree with your being unblocked is a topic ban on editing about racial issues or conspiracy theories(broadly construed), and knowing what you would edit about instead. Otherwise, you seem to be here to advance an agenda. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 20:29, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.