Staring souls in Durham

The first sighting was in the 19th century, when a group of mysterious individuals; layered in black clothing, were spotted solemnly staring at a lamppost in market square. When questioned, they said nothing, following the movements of passers by, who were disturbing them.

This group of 'staring souls' are described as mixed in age, silent and sloth like in speed. It is suspected that these are lost souls of people of who have drowned in the river Wear and are searching for the light that they once knew if life. They have been spotted staring at anything that shines light; e.g. street lamps, through people's windows and even at the night sky.

They are harmless in nature, but creepy in character, they will remain in their location til they are summoned back through the doorway which they had entered our world from.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Staring souls in Durham (January 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 12:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, PeteJenkins72! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Staring souls in Durham

edit
 

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Staring souls in Durham, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KylieTastic (talk) 12:32, 20 January 2023 (UTC)Reply