May 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. MrOllie (talk) 15:39, 29 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Can you define by not constructive? or do you mean you did not sgree with it? PeakyblindersOMGS (talk) 15:45, 29 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

PeakyblindersOMGS, I mean you are adding material that is blatantly false. Even the source you are adding does not support what you are writing. MrOllie (talk) 15:48, 29 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Marques Brownlee. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 20:25, 31 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

I understand, i think the other editor and i had a misunderstanding but now its solved. PeakyblindersOMGS (talk) 20:56, 31 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

It is not resolved and I am not sure why you thought it was. Please read WP:BLP, WP:SOCIALMEDIA and WP:SYNTH. The source has to explicitly support the claim you making which the Instagram post does not and it is her post, not his, so cannot be used to support claims about him. What you need is a reliable source that specifically states Hair is Brownlee's girlfriend and "longtime" is subjective (is that months, years, etc.). Wikipedia takes WP:BLP seriously so extreme care is required. I will provide you some additional information about editing Wikipedia. Please do take the time to read through the matrial before you continue to edit. You are new so mistakes are understandable but you have to show you are willing to listen and learn. S0091 (talk) 21:46, 31 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! S0091 (talk) 21:50, 31 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

June 2021

edit

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Marques Brownlee. Thank you. Saucy[talkcontribs] 08:10, 1 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at EZTV shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 15:27, 2 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

You are involved in that edit war as well MrOllie so if you report me you will get banned as well. PeakyblindersOMGS (talk) 15:38, 2 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

You are the one at 4 reverts in 24 hours. - MrOllie (talk) 15:39, 2 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
Its called three-revert rule not four evert rule MrOllie PeakyblindersOMGS (talk) 15:47, 2 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Bobby690 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bobby690. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:19, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply