Welcome!

edit

Hi Peaceful-D! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Paul_012 (talk) 20:32, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

On that note, I'd also like to emphasize that Wikipedia is a collaborative project. Try to learn from the edits others make, and don't just stick to what you think looks good, which might not be in-line with Wikipedia's Manual of Style or other policies and guidelines. Thanks. --Paul_012 (talk) 20:41, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

I was trying to guide you with some helpful edits and advice, but I'm not prepared to mentor a new editor who's uninterested in learning. You might find better luck at the Teahouse, linked above. But if you continue single-mindedly reverting changes you don't understand, there's little chance that your draft is going to be approved. --Paul_012 (talk) 20:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, Paul,for this message.
Please accept my apologies for rejecting your original two edits at first, before fully understanding the reasons behind them and the Wikipedia rules to which they corresponded. I have restored those edits, with a few added minor changes. In the future, I will pay much more careful attention to your edits if there are any more and will try to learn from them. I appreciate the lessons here. While eliminating some voluminous discussion from here, I did save it for future reference.
No problem. As for the Santikaro draft, eventually, it should be developed to the point that the biography content can be separated into its own section, with a WP:lead section summarizing the content. That would address any current paragraph breaking concerns. --Paul_012 (talk) 06:16, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much for your kind reply, Paul_012.
A quick question about how to improve compliance of this article with the rules, only if you have the time and the ability to respond, of course:
After looking over more carefully the rules on external links, it seems that this article would have a better chance of acceptance if all the external links to audio sources were turned into web citations. This is some work, so I was hoping to verify with you first if it's worthwhile to change them all into web citations remaining with zero external links in the article itself. Peaceful-D (talk) 15:46, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Well, with lists of works by an author (the relevant guideline is at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lists of works), most Wikipedia articles only include major publications like books, papers, etc. Extensive lists of talks or lectures are usually considered too detailed for the purpose of Wikipedia, which is to provide an encyclopedia article about the subject rather than a detailed index of their works. It would be more in-line with Wikipedia practice to just link to the Soundcloud, Audio Dharma and Dharma Seed index pages as external links in a dedicated External links section. --Paul_012 (talk) 17:18, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Paul_012, thanks so much, I will try to follow this guideline over the next week or so. Peaceful-D (talk) 17:50, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Just dropping a note about Special:Email/Oversight for actually hiding edits like the previous. Primefac (talk) 20:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks very much, Primefac, I saw the message on your user page and understand what you mean. I do not need any special oversight action for this case, as it is no big deal that the IP is revealed, it changes every few hours anyhow, via DHCP from my ISP. It happened because I resonded to the message from another device and probably was not signed in from there so it used the IP instead of the username, just guessing. Peaceful-D (talk) 21:57, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Santikaro (June 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ToadetteEdit! 14:25, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Peaceful-D! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ToadetteEdit! 14:25, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply