Pane.Vino.Wiki
Arno Gujon edit
Hello. I have seen that you reverted the whole edit I made for Arno Gujon. Could you please justify the reasoning behind that? The article is written with a very obvious fan point of view, and many phrases should be removed. You can see that there are many issues like Fan POV and I tried to remove material that is not suitable. In your comment you mention that the material is sourced, but it is not suitably phrased for Extracting the meaning of significant coverage as a general notability guideline. I see that you may not have a lot of experience in editing, so please feel free to evaluate the text in more detail. Chiserc (talk) 23:21, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Phrases should not be removed but changed if you find them problematic. Article is here for years now, and you should not remove sourced content but find compromise in fixing the article. Please dont remove sourced material, but please feel free to help fix the problematic parts, sentence by sentence, as subject is obviously important, and each information is valuable. --Pane.Vino.Wiki (talk) 00:59, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I don't believe that to be an accurate interpretation of policy. How long content has stayed up is irrelevant. Content is removed from articles all the time. Good day—RetroCosmos talk 04:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
March 2024 edit
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Do not remove maintenance templates from an article you created. Good day—RetroCosmos talk 04:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- If you state here on your Talk page that neither article is about you, or someone you have been paid to write about, or know personally, then an independent editor can remove that tag from the articles. It might help if you add what led you to write about these two people. David notMD (talk) 11:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- @User:David notMD, I was not paid to create any article, i created those two as Arnaud is very known and notable internationally and it was strange that article didnt existed, and Zoran was in the news just recently as he donated large sum of medical equipment to several hospitals, and received one of the highest recognitions in the country. That's why it was also strange to me that such important people does not have articles. I understand now what way my problem, any further explanations, opinions and "big words" should not be added, but just plain facts without any comments about importance of those. Thank you all for explanations it meant a lot to me. I would love to fix the articles in the way it should be, and therefor propose to move discusion to the talk page of the article(s) for any further info. --Pane.Vino.Wiki (talk) 22:10, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Advice edit
You have recently made edits related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe. This is a standard message to inform you that the Balkans or Eastern Europe is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Zoran Kalabić for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoran Kalabić until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.