December 2016

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia moronically, as you did at Michael Reagan, this IP will be blocked from editing privileges. Quis separabit? 01:05, 2 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:11, 2 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

April 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 01:10, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply


I provided proper sources and the information is relevant to the subject. Peer to peer rental is an interesting subject and I am tracking the leaders of that industry. Will be adding more. If you want, edit the text but do not delete it. Not fair for someone that is working hard to contribute. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pablito1977 (talkcontribs)

Thanks for your work, but we can't promote particular companies on Wikipedia. Write about the industry in general instead of companies in particular and you should be fine. - 75.136.67.37 (talk) 15:33, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

But, there are millions of companies on Wikipedia. How is that possible then?

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rentus’ (April 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 05:04, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Pablito1977, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:04, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sillicon Beach

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Sillicon Beach requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpbT 20:09, 10 April 2017 (UTC)Reply