PVIVEK NEGI

Welcome!

Hi PVIVEK NEGI! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! GPL93 (talk) 20:52, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Body mass index, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Zefr (talk) 20:55, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Conflict of interest

Hello, PVIVEK NEGI. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.}}-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:59, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Daniel Case (talk) 22:03, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PVIVEK NEGI (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I accept that I made some edits that may violate Wikipedia policy but those edits were not intended for any promotional purpose, instead those edits give relevant information about the topic.

I saw there are many references inserted that look like promotional material of websites that does not give any authentic information about the topic but I don't know why you don't remove them.

so I thought that we can add information on Wikipedia with reference links.

I assure you I will not repeat this again, instead of contributing with relevant information. you may block me if repeated.

Thank you Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 15:58, 9 July 2021 (UTC) VIVEK NEGI 12:09, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Unblock request was withdrawn below. ^{!ɘM γɿɘυϘ}⅃ϘƧ 23:53, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• To be fair to the OP, they were blocked as a spam-only account but had made a handful of unrelated good-faith edits in 2018 and 2019. I'd consider unblocking with a prohibition on linking to their website anywhere on Wikipedia (including their user pages). @Daniel Case:, thoughts?-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:02, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Waiting for a reply on Ponyo's suggestion. 331dot (talk) 10:05, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

I would like to know if the same person has been behind the account during both periods of activity. Daniel Case (talk) 19:13, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I am the only person who is using this account. Again I apologize for any violation. Thank you VIVEK NEGI 19:39, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

OK, so why did you edit productively a couple of years ago but not recently? Daniel Case (talk) 17:08, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

I have already given the reason that I thought we can add external links giving relevant information about the topic, also, I apologized for the violation and not repeating the mistake also said that if repeated then you can block. You blocked me for editing and I accept it because I deserve it now I take back my unblock request. Thanks, VIVEK NEGI 19:26, 11 July 2021 (UTC)