User talk:Optakeover/Archive/2015/July

Universal Church of the Kingdom of God

Good morning Mr. Optakeover,

I am writing to you because I tried to modify the information on the article, I tried inserting the information that was on the Portuguese article but you have denied me the access to do so stating that I am vandalizing and am making nonconstructive edits.

As a member of The Universal Church I find that the information in the article is very irrelevant to the church and as well has information wrongly stated and in a biased point of view. The Portuguese Wikipedia article is the most correct one. I am not saying this because the English article talks about the flaws of the church. The Portuguese article also has the good and bad events of the church. It’s just that it’s more complete and explained properly without any biased input on it. The Portuguese article in Wikipedia also has an extended list of 7 pages of references to all their information which is way much more complete than this article. With this it may be concluded that that information in the Portuguese article has more supporting evidence.

Please allow me to make the necessary changes.

Thank you so much and I appreciate all your time.

Jayari23 (talk) 14:02, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

@Jayari23: Hi Jayari. Just because you may disagree with the article on what it stands for, that doesn't mean you can change it to meet your views on what is right and wrong by removing content without any reason. Please see WP:NPOV for Wikipedia's policy on neutral point of view. Above everything else, your edits must be taken from verifiable sources. Once again, please do not remove content without a reason, and please be neutral. Regards, Optakeover^(Talk) 07:55, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Siddharth Nigam

Sir Siddharth Nigam is actually 15 now because Dhoom 3's shooting began in 2012 and he was 13 then. Its written in the 1st article that he was 13. Please do kindly change the age. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siddhinigam7 (talk • contribs) 10:55, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

@Siddhinigam7:Hi, please read WP:VERIFIABILITY to understand that you must show evidence from a source online that confirms the date. Optakeover^(Talk) 16:14, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Thank you sir. I will do so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siddhinigam7 (talk • contribs) 09:22, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Note

Given the slim chance that this is a sincere question, it does have an answer: The OP's premise is indeed wrong. No matter where someone falls on the abortion debate, I think everyone can agree that there is no actual person prior to fertilization. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 14:03, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

@Baseball Bugs: I have edited the warning to reflect my apology to him, but I won't be restoring his edit as a reversion of good faith edit. I give him the benefit of the doubt he wasn't talking about abortion. I was about to give my take on it, but effectively I'm agreeing with you. I will just quickly comment that to me, not only the genetic definition, even the logical definition of "you" can't be established until fertilization, and since it is scientifically concluded that only one sperm can fertilize the egg at all, we are indeed talking about absolutes; the sperm that didn't fertilize the egg would have absolutely no chance to define "you" both genetically and logically; even though I personally am not for pure determinism, I do believe that the odds are completely in favour of the idea that "you" can only be defined by one egg and one sperm, and so all other genetic definitions of "you" cannot possibly exist. Do let me know if you believe his question deserves a proper answer on the page instead of keeping the revert. Optakeover^(Talk) 14:51, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

I'm not keen on restoring it. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 14:55, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Okay. If he is interested to raise his question again, he is free to do so without further intervention from me. Optakeover^(Talk) 14:55, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Another customer

Hi there - you just left me a message about removing content from Dyn's page. I think this is a mistake and believe someone logged into my account and changed this. I am updating my account settings now and changing my password. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chwagen (talk • contribs)

That's odd, Chwagen, because that villain just did the same thing on the same article. Very mysterious! Drmies (talk) 16:17, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Chwagen. Thank you for your contributions! Please do not remove content without providing a reason. Your edits may be construed as blanking or vandalism. Regards, Optakeover^(Talk) 16:21, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

SepehrOoO2

I think we've both simultaneously tagged him/her for the same vandalism after your earlier warning. You at level 2 and me at level 4. I think he/she needs to be guided to the exit so they can see the potential consequences of continuing their vandalism. I leave it to you if you want to remove either caution. Regards, Bazj (talk) 16:14, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

@Bazj: Thank you. That is his last chance. I'll report him if it happens again. Optakeover^(Talk) 16:16, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

...and it has, Negar.Mir. Barely a pause in their rush toward the exit. Less than 3 hours from entrance to exit is pretty impressive. Bazj (talk) 16:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

I have already reported him. He has been blocked indefinitely. Cheers and happy editing! Optakeover^(Talk) 16:24, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

User page protection

Hello, I can semi-protect your user page if that's okay with you.– Gilliam (talk) 16:47, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

@Gilliam: Sure. By the way the recent edit on my user main page by the anon is me in control of the anon, not intending to disrupt Wikipedia. I wanted to know how Huggle displays user edits of other users' userspace. It seems Huggle isn't doing a very good job as compared to version 2 in this area. Optakeover^(Talk) 16:49, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Done. BTW, you can still carry out user page tests at User:Sandbox.– Gilliam (talk) 17:06, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

@Gilliam: Understood. But I'm not sure if Huggle will ignore recent changes on Sandbox. That is my concern, I still am very unsure about the behaviour of Huggle for namespace edits. I think I'll raise my concerns with Huggle's developers. Optakeover^(Talk) 17:07, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

But pp will be effective at stopping vandalism so I don't have to guard my userspace too closely from now. Thanks, Optakeover^(Talk) 17:11, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Edit to Jumpin Gene Simmons

hello. The changes I made to the page where done because I am related to him and I know that specific content to be untrue and should be deleted. Jsrr15 (talk) 19:22, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Jsrr15. You deleted information that was properly sourced from the link given. Please do not remove content without discussing with others. Such edits can be considered disruptive and can lead to blocking. Also, please read WP:POV on issues regarding point-of-view conflict. Please do not remove edits just because you are related to someone and you think that it is untrue, especially when there is evidence to back the content up. Regards, Optakeover^(Talk) 19:27, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Your CSD

Hi. Just to let you know, with reference to Draft:Tozex, the A7 criterion does not apply to articles in the draft space. Kharkiv07 (T) 21:35, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

And just as an FYI (in response to your comment on Musik's talk page) I found this page created by a new user at User:Tozex (an account that doesn't exist), and I simply moved it to Draft:Tozex. It's not my article and I have no invested interest in it. Kharkiv07 (T) 21:40, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

@Kharkiv07: I didn't message you, right? Okay, my worry was that I did. Thank you for your comment. I knew that but I may have gotten confused eventually. Optakeover^(Talk) 21:41, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

ANI question

I'm curious how you ran across an old legal threat on an obscure page. Do you have a program that looks for these things? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 00:57, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

@Baseball Bugs: It was Huggle. I can't remember exactly what I did. I think I saw this edit being made: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Jamathi&oldid=673835024. I probably took a closer look and then realised that that user had blanked a threat. Optakeover^(Talk) 06:14, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

I dunno

Seems like a pretty productive editor to me... [1] --NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:25, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Oh no you spotted it! XD Thankfully not of village stocks proportions. Optakeover^(Talk) 15:26, 31 July 2015 (UTC)