Welcome!

Hello, Ondoyjoiel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Well, I guess this is a delayed welcome template, but you might find the contents useful, so here it is. Also check List of Bohol-related topics so you can contribute in any one of them. --Pinay06 (TalkEmail) 21:28, 21 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Messages

edit

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Your article appeared to be wholly incoherent. Would you like to review it before it vanishes?--Anthony.bradbury 01:32, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Game of the Generals article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

Feel free to re-submit a new version of the article. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I irrevocably release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, for use on Wikipedia and elsewhere."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page. Martinp23 15:09, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Abundio Noel M. Libot

edit

A tag has been placed on Abundio Noel M. Libot, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please write {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --TeaDrinker 02:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Loyola School of Theology

edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Loyola School of Theology, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.lst.edu/home.asp. As a copyright violation, Loyola School of Theology appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Loyola School of Theology has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Loyola School of Theology. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Loyola School of Theology, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. ... discospinster talk 15:48, 22 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Barangay Mansasa

edit

Your article on Mansasa was a good start, not to mention initiative, only that the information is taken or all copied from Barangay Mansasa, hence may be a potential copyvio. I suggest you improve the article in your own words and add other references. As for this reference [1], are you able to translate the contents? --Pinay06 07:42, 28 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Panaghoy sa Suba

edit

Your article Panaghoy sa Suba is all copied from this source hence is copyvio and might be deleted...It has to be re-written in own words! See Wikipedia:Copyrights for a full explanation. All submissions must be compatible with the GFDL. You can still follow the basic outline that you have, but everything needs to be phrased in your own words instead of using text that someone else has already copyrighted. --Pinay06 03:02, 30 November 2006 (UTC)']]']Reply

Proposed deletion of Felimon P. Libot

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Felimon P. Libot, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No solid notability - a priest who ran a school.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Scott Mac (Doc) 16:06, 28 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia meetup in Cebu, May 2009

edit

Speedy deletion nomination of Tahanan ni Santa Paula Montal

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Tahanan ni Santa Paula Montal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Alastair Rae (talk) 16:30, 2 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of 3 Stones

edit
 

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as 3 Stones, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Briarfallen (talk) 09:14, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Himontagon Hills

edit
 

The article Himontagon Hills has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication that this meets WP:NATFEAT - can't find any sources that aren't blogs or commercial tourist guide BS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC(talk) 00:00, 9 October 2024 (UTC)Reply