OfekRon

Welcome!

Hello, OfekRon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as ASSort, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! OlYeller^Talktome 17:31, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ASSort

The article ASSort has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of importance or notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. OlYeller^Talktome 17:31, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Conflict of interest

Hello OfekRon. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

1. Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
2. Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
3. Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
4. Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 17:58, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of ASSort for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ASSort is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ASSort until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. OlYeller^Talktome 18:02, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, OfekRon. You have new messages at OlYeller21's talk page.
Message added 18:10, 17 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

OlYeller^Talktome 18:10, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Establishing notability

If your new ASSort algorithm is all that you say it is, your best route is to submit a paper to one of the established computing journals, so that the algorithm may receive the proper peer review. If it is deemed to be worthy of publication by a major journal, then that publication itself would be sufficient to establish notability. Then (and only then) could a valid article be created on Wikipedia. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:39, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Reply

i dont know who to address, not that it is your concern, but i was hoping one of the vetren computer science involved members and users of Wiki would be able to acknowledge my discovery, otherwise its gonna stay unpublished, casue i have no strings to pull to get this published elsewhere, all i want is to share my idea to programmers around the word so they can use it and hopefully teach it in courses someday. (thats a dream that i have)

OfekRon OfekRon (talk) 20:07, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

If, as you claim, this is a revolutionary new sorting algorithm, then you could submit it to any of the journals listed in Category:Computer science journals. Your college professor should be able to help you with this. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:09, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

well you leave me no choice but to give up, i am thankfull however for the oppurtunity to discuss the deletion before it is accured, but in some weird way its up to you now.

if you have the slightest belif that maybe there is something in this and you know someone that can exemine my algorithm,then this would be great, im pretty sure there are a lot of wiki members that definitely can approve that - and easily. if not then thanks for everything and have a great day.

OfekRon (talk) 20:34, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:03, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. OfekRon (talk) 20:07, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, ASSort

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, ASSort. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Sorting algorithm. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Sorting algorithm - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Safiel (talk) 21:23, 17 August 2011 (UTC)