Your submission at Articles for creation: Camden Collective (November 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 19:00, 4 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nw1cmdn, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Nw1cmdn! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Soni (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:25, 5 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Camden Collective (November 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 06:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Camden Collective has been accepted

edit
 
Camden Collective, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Mz7 (talk) 23:18, 19 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

A belated welcome!

edit
 
Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!  

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Nw1cmdn. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Mz7 (talk) 23:35, 19 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Collective Logo Black RGB.jpg

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Collective Logo Black RGB.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you.

Basically, when you uploaded File:Collective Logo Black RGB.jpg, you added a tag on the file's description page that stated you were the copyright holder to the logo, and therefore, you have the authority to release elements of your copyright under a Creative Commons license. However, there is no evidence on Camden Collective's website that they have made this file free to use by anyone, and there is also no evidence that you represent Camden Collective.

I appreciate that you've uploaded a higher quality image of the logo, however, and if the file is, in fact, non-free, then the file probably won't be deleted, but allowed to stay under Wikipedia's non-free content policy. I apologize for the complexity of the situation; Wikipedia takes copyrights very seriously, and we want to get image licensing right. If you have any questions, please let me know. Mz7 (talk) 19:16, 31 January 2016 (UTC)Reply