Noot Noooooot

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mazda3 (first generation) (April 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Mazda3 (first generation) may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 21:25, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Noot Noooooot! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 21:25, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Mazda3 into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 22:23, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi Noot Noooooot! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Mazda3 several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Mazda3, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Dorsetonian (talk) 10:04, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

• Please read this note: It appears, based on your editing, that you are trying to spin out the first generation section of the Mazda3 article into it's own new article. You have attempted to do this by copying the text into Draft:Mazda3 (first generation) and submitting it as an article through Articles for Creation. As noted in amy warning posted earlier on your page, copying within Wikipedia requires attribution, and this copying to a draft did not provide attribution. As well, spinning out does not require going through a draft. Instead, for a major change like this, you need to initiate a discussion at Talk:Mazda3 proposing what you want to do, and explain why it is needed. If the proposal gains consensus, then it can be split out. If you need help with editing, or understanding policies, you can post your question at the Teahouse as noted in the Teahouse invitation above. -- Whpq (talk) 13:53, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Mateodor per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mateodor. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 11:01, 8 April 2023 (UTC)