Your submission at Articles for creation: Kejia Wu (September 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zanhe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Zanhe (talk) 05:57, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Noahsoptions! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Zanhe (talk) 05:57, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kejia Wu (November 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MurielMary (talk) 11:23, 10 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kejia Wu has been accepted

edit
 
Kejia Wu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 18:31, 9 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kejia Wu

edit
 

The article Kejia Wu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Kejia Wu moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Kejia Wu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Sagotreespirit (talk) 06:45, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

can you be more specific... The sources include major reliable sources including Financial Times, New York Times, Routledge, etc...
What do you consider reliable sources? Noahsoptions (talk) 06:49, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kejia Wu (December 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zoglophie was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
zoglophie•talk• 11:01, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kejia Wu (December 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mach61 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Mach61 (talk) 07:22, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kejia Wu (January 31)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mach61 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Mach61 (talk) 05:06, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kejia Wu (March 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Remsense was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: As stated in the article, subject is only quoted in major outlets. These are passing mentions, and do not together demonstrate notability.
Remsense 19:36, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply