Noahe123

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

December 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Schwede66 20:02, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

You were first informed of copyright in April 2019 with this edit. User:Blythwood then then informed you about some finer details of this problem. Then in early June, you started the Pukerua Bay School until User:Gadfium warned you of a copyright violation later that month. I'm not sure why you requested your Pukerua Bay School article to be deleted in August but after that was done, you restarted that article in October. By doing so, you have reintroduced the copyviolation. Here's an example:

• source: ... the school opening at Pukerua Bay local children had to catch the train or walk to the nearest school which was at Plimmerton.
• your article: ... the school opened in Pukerua Bay, local children had to catch a train or walk to the nearest school in Plimmerton.

• source: By 1940 there were nearly 50 pupils with two teachers and the original classroom was becoming somewhat crowded.
• your article: In 1940, there were almost 50 pupils with two teachers, and the original classroom was getting a little crowded.

• source: The following year another classroom was added and since then further classrooms have been added as the school roll has expanded.
• your article: A further classroom was added the following year, and since then further classrooms have been added as the school roll has expanded.

So this is the third time that you introduce a copy violation. I'm sorry but I see no other way but to block you as per WP:WHYBLOCK. Schwede66 20:03, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Noahe123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have made some good improvements to wikipedia article Noahe123 (talk) 21:05, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This unblock request does not address the reasons for the block. I strongly suggest you read the guide to appealing blocks before making another unblock request. stwalkerster (talk) 21:13, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've restored the declined unblock message that you removed. While blocked, you are not permitted to remove declined unblock requests. stwalkerster (talk) 21:18, 17 December 2019 (UTC)