NoémieH

Welcome! edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hello, NoémieH, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Romaine (talk) 14:24, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

PS: The project page is at Wikipedia:Benelux Education Program/Maastricht University/FASOS Spring 2018. Romaine (talk) 14:24, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: China Illustrata (May 27) edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hi NoemiehH, pls see below comment and action accordingly before resumbit

The lead section/introduction doesnt tell the reader what this book is about. It needs to address the sum of the article -please see MOS:LEAD.
There inline citation for the author, but none for the book. This article is about the book, so it need independent and reliable source to back up the content.
Mainly talk about what in the book is not enough, you need to find review info of this book and add in the article.
"Up until today the book is considered "an important source of informations on the beginnings of western sinology and sinophilism in Europe" from the source, I cant find this quote. You might have place the source wrongly.
Wikipedia can NOT be the source - see WP:CIRCULAR
The source in the external - use them as source for reference and do away the external link.
This book has the potential to meet nobility guidelines, you just need to have more reliable source and add content about the book (review, the significant of this book and etc).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:China Illustrata and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:China Illustrata, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:29, 27 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, NoémieH! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:29, 27 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Some remarks edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Noémie,

I see that your draft article has fallen into the "AfC"-circus. I don't quiet understand why you nominated it for the review process in this early stage. As you have seen, it did not pass the tests. I'm sorry about that. But I did also see that you have continued editing on the draft. Great. And personally, I think that it is becoming quite a good article by now. For your own convenience, you could perhaps make a copy of the text and put it back in your sandbox (and delete the redirect to the Draft namespace). Ask Romaine for help , on Monday, if you don't manage.

I would like to make a couple of remarks concerning your draft.

Perhaps you can use the Template:Infobox book in your article. See for instance the draft of Nabilah's article or Life of Sir William Petty 1623 - 1687. It does automatically turn the title of your lemma in italics.
Perhaps it is useful to start with a small paragraph with bibliographic information. In this section you can also make references to online editions (perhaps in a footnote), like the one you have already mentioned, an especially to IA: this link, for instance. You could perhaps also incorporate some text from the paragraph "Publisher" in it. And were there any later editions of the book?
You should make more "wikilinks" in your draft to other Wikipedia-articles, like missionary, Jesuit China missions, humanities, sciences, etc. etc.
Don't use external links in your text, like "illustrations", to the ricci-site. Use a footnote instead.
see also: fr:China illustrata, the article about China Illustrata on the french Wikipedia (and other language Wikipedias).
make a link to commons:Category:China Illustrata; you can use Template:Commons category for that.

I hope these comments are of any use to you. Goodbye, and good luck! --Dick Bos (talk) 15:22, 3 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: China Illustrata has been accepted edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

China Illustrata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 05:26, 5 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic