Nhbccip

Yesterday.sg

A tag has been placed on Yesterday.sg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Yesterday.sg and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eeekster (talk) 01:55, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Yesterday.sg, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:43, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Your hangon rationale

You say, when stating the reason why you made the page Yesterday.sg, Firstly, it endeavors to provide yesterday.sg with an increase in exposure (...) Sorry, but if that is your goal, then Wikipedia is not the right place. You must get the increased exposure first and then write the Wikipedia article, as is the case in fact with every encyclopedia. This is true regardless of whether the organization you are writing about is commercial, non-profit, governmental, or whatever else you might think of. For more information, please see Wikipedia policies on notability, conflict of interest, and advertizing. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 03:24, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Yesterday.sg

An article that you have been involved in editing, Yesterday.sg, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yesterday.sg. Thank you.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 12:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nhbccip (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

your reason here

Decline reason:

No reason given. Please see WP:GAB — Smashville^talk 02:39, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nhbccip (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am a fairly new wiki user so I do hope for your understanding in this matter. I editted the above-mentioned article for the third time as I firmly believe that it would benefit wiki users whom are interested in Singapore's historical and cultural sites. The aim of this page is NOT solely just to raise awareness about yesterday.sg. Rather, it is to provide an additional avenue for others to learn more about Singapore's historical heritage. We hope that individuals would be able to get a better understanding of Singapore's history through this page and to my understanding, that is what wiki is about; for individuals to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of a subject matter. I would appreciate it if you could enlighten me on the specifics of the page which do not meet wiki's standards and I will do my best to structure it in a way which is acceptable to your administration. Thanks for your understanding.

Decline reason:

What I understand is that you're talking about the article, not about the fact that you reverted more than three times, which is what you're blocked for. In other words, this is about you, not what you wrote. — Daniel Case (talk) 20:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Spam in Patron of the Arts Award

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Patron of the Arts Award, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Patron of the Arts Award is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Patron of the Arts Award, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 09:10, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Patron of the Arts Award has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Trusilver 01:46, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Patron of the Arts Award constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Trusilver 01:51, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Patron of the Arts Award. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. William Avery (talk) 01:54, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Patron of the Arts Award. Techman224^Talk 01:58, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:Notability -- not all topics are suitable for a Wikipedia article. utcursch | talk 02:29, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one fortnight in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Toddst1 (talk) 02:45, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Patron of Heritage Awards

A tag has been placed on Patron of Heritage Awards requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ironholds (talk) 02:46, 30 January 2009 (UTC)