Questions edit

Hi Nepalirider123, I would like to ask you some questions:

(1) Why did you add userboxes to your userpage claiming that:

  • You speak Croatian as your native language
  • You have been on Wikipedia for over 2 years
  • You are a member of WikiProject Croatia
  • You are a member of the Athletics WikiProject
  • You have made a ton of edits (when you had actually made only 26 edits, and still have only made 150 article-space edits)
  • You are one of the 400 most active English Wikipedians of all time
  • You have written or expanded 27 articles featured in the Did You Know section on the Main Page

(2) Why did you add the following unreceived barnstars to your userpage:

  • The Barnstar of Peace
  • The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
  • The Barnstar of Diligence
  • The Original Barnstar
  • Military history reviewers' award
  • The Croatian Barnstar of Merit
  • 100000 Edits
  • The Invisible Barnstar

(3) Why did you assist Rajusharmaofc in hijacking a completely unrelated user's account? Previously you claimed that the Nepali user merely wanted you to change his account name. But that was not the case. It is and was perfectly clear that the account of Adamsmith (a sophisticated English speaker) did not belong to Rajusharmaofc, but you helped him hijack it -- not once, but twice: [1], [2].

-- Softlavender (talk) 12:37, 31 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

My Answers To Your Specific Questions edit

Hi Softlavender, I would love to give you an answer to your specific questions and hope i can satisfy you with following:
First of all, i would like to start by saying; at that time i was obviously a new wikipedian and i needed an idea to create or to design own user page. I know i was stupid and shouldn't have to do that to create or to design user page. but my lazy bones and crooked mind would have told me to do that. otherwise, no one would do that sort of mean things and i am not shying away for accepting it even in the present. I know i could have create own user boxes or i could have used other userboxes that are already exist in the wikipedia domain . and because of that stupidity today i am having tons of questions from genuine wiki user like you. and i have a feeling inside of me that i should address some of those past activities that i had indulge in. As i have already mentioned above it was not my intention to use some other's user boxes and format, all that was happened because of my lazy habit. So, i hereby accepted all your allegations against it and in return thanking you for your hard work that you have shown for finding out all the facts for to get to the bottom of the roots. I appreciate your hard work, i really do, and i hope i will perform as you are performing since the time you joined to wiki as an user. and I know, my commencement doesn't show that but i will try my best. As you can see i have maintain the page and it looks totally different than the past. i have try to use my own idea to design it in proper way, i hope i somehow satisfied some of you as it doesn't look the way it used to look in the past.However, I am not a perfect and no one is perfect, all we have some flaws and we have to accept that at the end of the day we all are human and we learn from our mistakes and i have learned it already. Thank you from bottom of my heart, and regards to hacking; when i had asked that user, which name you want? he was told me to make AdamSmith and again i should have checked once before changing/moving user page but the stupid mind didn't click at the right time and when it clicked the work was already over and the name was already been changed. so i suggest him to change again to another and finally he/she came up with AdamSmith12 and thats how that username was created. i hope my answer satisfied you and at last i would like to assure you that it won't happen again in the future.  :) Nepalirider123 (talk) 7:31, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
The thing is, you didn't just move an account, you actually hacked and hijacked it, and you knew that it belonged to someone else entirely, someone you had never heard of and who was the innocent victim of your hacking/hijacking. There's no possible excuse for you to hack/hijack someone else's account. Softlavender (talk) 14:14, 31 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Further questions edit

Why do you have userboxes on your current userpage that claim, among other things, that:

  • You contribute to template namespace
  • You are a member of the Athletics WikiProject
  • You have made a ton of edits (when you have only made 150 article-space edits)
-- Softlavender (talk) 14:25, 31 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much :) Yes, those user boxes will be remove shortly. lately i have been busy with some personal work and to be honest with you, actually i didn't noticed it.Now finally i have,so I assure you that it will be replaced with the right user-boxes . Thank you  :) "Softlavender":) ,Nepalirider123 (talk) 6:14, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
To be "honest"? Honest is something you have not been, all along. You can't not notice that you have completely dishonest userboxes on your userpage. I would like you to read WP:HONEST, a core value that you've violated over and over and over on Wikipedia. Softlavender (talk) 15:33, 31 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
Indeed true, i have never been honest to myself and to anyone else that is why i have lots of flaws in my own. I have learned a great lessons for not being honest, i will try to correct it on my way further. and again thank you for your contribution to finding all the flaws that i have. I can't thank you enough for it. i am aware of WP:HONEST this, but again i was so careless and as i promised earlier it will never be repeated again  :) Nepalirider123 (talk) 7:03, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:List of Nepalese actresses edit

 Template:List of Nepalese actresses has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 13:59, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Nepali Actress edit

 Template:Nepali Actress has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ♠PMC(talk) 07:26, 4 June 2018 (UTC)Reply