Your submission at Articles for creation: TO Kinesiology - Personal Trainer and Kinesiologist in Toronto (September 22) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hammersoft was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hammersoft (talk) 16:48, 22 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, NemanjaSambaher! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hammersoft (talk) 16:48, 22 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

 

Hello NemanjaSambaher. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Draft:TO Kinesiology - Personal Trainer and Kinesiologist in Toronto, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:NemanjaSambaher. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=NemanjaSambaher|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:49, 22 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I am not ure exactly how to respon to your message, but hopefully you will get this message here - I am not paid or don't have any financial interest. I am the owner of the company and wanted to put my business page on Wikipedia. I thought I have disclosed this by pasting the code that Wikipedia required me to do. I also mentioned in the article my main so I thought it is very obvious who wrote the article. Also, I am not promoting anythin, it is just a objective description of my company. Please let me know what is your feedback. Thank you!

  • You do have a financial stake in promoting the company, as you are the owner of the company. Promotion of the company means you stand to benefit, thus the financial stake. I see from your userpage that you placed the code there, but it was surrounded by "nowiki" code which prevents it from displaying properly. I've fixed it for you. Please understand that Wikipedia is not a means of promotion. You also have a direct conflict of interest in writing about this company. I know to you it seems the draft is an objective description of the company, but it is not. From an outside view, it is decidedly non-neutral. We write in a neutral tone here. Also understand that Wikipedia is not a business directory. The mere existence of your company is not sufficient reason to place an article here about it. We have standards regarding the notability of companies. What I am seeing so far, this company does not meet those standards. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:14, 22 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ok, I see. That makes sense. Please remove the content then, or if you wish I can do that for you. Thank you for taking the time to review this.

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:TO Kinesiology - Personal Trainer and Kinesiologist in Toronto, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 15:55, 3 June 2019 (UTC)Reply