User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 61

This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Please sign your comments with four tildes (~).

Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

_______________________________________________________________________

Notations 21 Project

You deleted "Notations 21 Project". I know there are many pages in WP that refer, for example, to individuals who are not particularly famous historically. However, Notations 21 Project IS significant, because it is reviving an effort by John Cage (very famous in the world of music) to promote new ways of communication between people in many cultures. These new musical scores are artwork, the music is created from a fusion of the concept of the composer plus the experiences of the performer or performers, and individuals share their various ways of expressing. This new direction provides the seeds of what may be a new "classical" music, or perhaps the equivalent of a next "New Age" music phenomenon, while including the best aspects of world music. If you have a suggestion on how to convey this so it does not seem to focus excessively on "promotion", I am open to it. If the issue is simply that Notations 21 Project is not known well, or that it is new, perhaps there are other ways to show its significance. I am open to suggestions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Opalcomp (talk • contribs) 14:59, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

• First, the article needs to be written in a more neutral fashion (for example, presenting the "Mission" section so prominently, in bullet points, makes it seem like the article is the official site for the project rather than a neutral report about it). Second, the article needs to cite reliable independent sources, see WP:V, to show that the project has been recognized as notable by third parties, see WP:N. I suggest that you work on a draft in your userspace, at User:Opalcomp/Notations 21 Project, and let me know when you think it meets these guidelines. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:17, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Tci Network

I notice you recently deleted TciNetwork, after my CSD, it has been recreated 3 times now, might be good to salt it. Gaijin42 (talk) 15:18, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Marco linno

Hi there, unless you speak Estonian I think deleting that article was a bist hasty. From what I got by a quick look and Google translation this guy seems to be an Estonian skiing person of some importance. And speaking for WP:PNT I think such pages should be assessed by people who speak the language before they are properly nominated for deletion. That said, please undelete that page so I can list it for translation. De728631 (talk) 21:02, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

• I used Google Translate also, and it indicated that this person was a youth-level athlete, which isn't enough per WP:ATHLETE. I will send it to your userspace at User:De728631/Marco Linno, though, per your request. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:12, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

• • Ok, in that case you can as well delete it again. I don't have any ambitions about this article, just thought it was a bit strange to see it deleted so quickly. Never mind. I'm going to drop the author a note though about writing non-English articles over here. De728631 (talk) 21:17, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Wellness Layers

You deleted my article about Wellness Layers. It was written objectively and used plenty of outside sources as well as the company's actual website. The article simply lists the company history and basic approach, which is a format I followed after looking at other company pages throughout Wikipedia. I don't think it was promotional at all, and I would like to have you consider undeleting my page. OZak29 (talk) 23:29, 4 November 2011 (UTC)OZak29

(talk page stalker) Moved to bottom, per talk page guidelines and NawlinWiki's own request. Was notability established by reliable, unaffiliated, third-party, secondary sources? Ian.thomson (talk) 23:36, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Fagen Pharmacy

You deleted the start of my article about Fagen Pharmacy before I even had a chance to expand upon it. You deleted the article within a couple of minutes after I posted it. Don't you think that's jumping the gun a little bit quickly? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rbarcus (talk • contribs) 11:33, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

• The article didn't indicate how this business is notable per WP:CORP. NawlinWiki (talk) 11:42, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Spier Wine Farm

Our article on the Spier Wine Farm was deleted because the web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable. The farm buildings contain an architectural element, namely the Cape Dutch Gables that are a unique architectural style found in the Western Cape. The farm buildings contain, in total, 21 gables, more than any other farm in the region. This is a noted historical and architectural feature and would be of interest to anyone interested in the history of the farm, or architecture of the Western Cape. Please can you provide some guidance as to why the article was deleted, or how to make the article more notable?

USBGroup4 (talk) 13:38, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

• You would need to cite reliable independent sources (see WP:V) to establish that this, or other factors, make this farm notable per WP:CORP. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:12, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Tony Burgess

I noticed you deleted an article I was looking at earlier tonight. The article was on the author Tony Burgess who wrote the novel Pontypool Changes Everything and several other books. The article may have had problems, I had not read it yet, I was planning on coming back to it later but now it is gone. However your listed reason for deletion: No explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content) seems odd to me. I am not knowledgeable about Mr. Burgess, that was why I was looking for his Wikipedia page after watching his screen adaptation of the novel Pontypool. but from what I gather from a Google search he is fairly widely known and the movie won some pretty impressive awards. If there was something really wrong with the article then I understand but if not I would like to see it undeleted, I am having trouble finding out much about this author elsewhere. Sorry if this is the wrong place I have only made one prior edit to Wikipedia so I am new to this. Mrthemuck (talk) 04:56, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

• You are right - I've reinstated the article. It would be great if you could add some sources to it. NawlinWiki (talk) 05:17, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Arbortext

Hi. I recently spent some time to re-add the Arbortext page. Some comments from other Wikipedia-ians in the past were that it didn't have enough references. So, I re-published some content, and then instantly sought feedback from our user community. Is it possible to give it a bit of time to let other users - users NOT at the parent company of PTC (my employer) to add some comments, references, etc., thus giving this page some depth (since that was one of the criticisms)? I put the page up on Friday November 4, and it's been re-directed already to the parent site (PTC). This prevents anyone from adding any comments, links, references, pictures, etc. Thanks. Looking forward to some guidance/co-operation. Abelniak (talk) 14:47, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

• The article as you wrote it was mostly advertising for Arbortext and its products, which was the reason the article was previously deleted. You also shouldn't be creating the article if you work for PTC, see WP:COI. If other users want to write a neutral, independently sourced article on Arbortext, they can do so by editing the redirect themselves. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:49, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

User:Iamdabomb1

Aside from a couple of user boxes, this new account's contributions consist almost entirely of vandalism (creating articles and files on a fantasy country, vandaliizing a redirect). Do you think this qualifies as a vandalism-only account? ScottyBerg (talk) 16:08, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

• Not yet - let's see if he does anything else after getting the level 3 warning. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 16:09, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • OK, thanks. I'd say he's on the cusp. ScottyBerg (talk) 16:10, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Tabikap

The page Tabikap was speedily deleted for G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.sotscm.org/ when it clearly says in the footer "Re-use is permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0" and I contested it stating such. According to the pages that were linked when the notice of deletion was put on the page that seemed like enough. Why was my appeal ignored? Psa3rvb (talk) 21:10, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Excuse me for barging in, but maybe I can help? You're right, it is released under CC-BY-SA 3.0. Did you properly attribute the material required by the license? I searched both the article and the talk page and could not find the proper attribution. Even if you had, there were other problems. The article didn't make any claim of worldly, historical significance. Why is the subject important to an encyclopedia? It also was overly promotional. All three of these issues (copyright, significance, and promotional) are reasons for a quick deletion. See WP:CSD.--v/r - TP 21:36, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

EuroTLX SIM S.p.A.

Dear, I have tried today to edit EuroTLX SIM S.p.A. e you deleted it 3 times. EuroTLX SIM S.p.A. is an Italian bonds market. We want only write in english what we have already wrote in intalian without any problem. Can you guide me how can wirte in the right way? Many Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sgrcesco (talk • contribs) 16:28, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

• You would need to cite reliable independent sources (see WP:V) that show that this company meets the notability standards set out at WP:CORP. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 16:59, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. how can I do it??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.215.153.212 (talk) 09:03, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Regarding the deletion of Músíktilraunir

The sentence was passed before the jury could hear my case and so the article Músíktilraunir was deleted. I don't know where the discussion about the proposed deletion took place and so I can't comment on the arguments in favour of deletion but the following was left as an explanation for the action taken: A7. No indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content).

Here are a few reasons why I think the subject of the article is noteworthy:

• This annual music contest is the biggest national event of its kind in Iceland and sponsors and collaborators include Icelandair, Rás 2 (on behalf of RÚV), Hitt Húsið (an information and culture centre) and many others.
• The contest is broadcast on national television and radio as well and the stakes are high since there are many awards for the top 3 bands and then the best bassists, drummers etc also gets awarded. Awards usually consist of studio time with known professionals, money, musical equipment, gift certificates, promotion etc.
• The contest has been a lunching pad for many nationally and internationally known artists and bands.

Of course the article wasn't "finished", it had just been created by me and so obviously the content didn't meet the standards of GAs nor FAs but I think that it was a bit extreme to delete it in its infancy and so I urge you to revive it. The competition is as noteworthy to Iceland as the terribly boring show "American Idol" is to the US, well actually the Icelandic Idol was more popular here but that's just because of the nature of the show - I'm just trying to make a point.

Cheers, Stefán Örvarr Sigmundsson (talk) 04:01, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

• Fair enough, I've reinstated the article. Please get some sources into it as soon as you can. NawlinWiki (talk) 04:10, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Regarding the deletion of The Phoenix Network

I have looked over the reasons for the deletion of this page, and am currently working on a revised version. Is there any way you can approve for me to post another page on The Phoenix Network (the completely re-edited version of course)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phoenix545 (talk • contribs) 18:44, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Hall Green United

It would appear that my article on Hall Green United has been deleted, for the 2nd time in 2 days. It was deleted yesterday on copyright infringements by Olyella21 who cited copyright infringements as the main issue. I was given the impression I could re-instate this page, if I was to use my own words and sentences. Something which I have spent time and effort doing today. So I'm surprised it has been deleted yet again because I haven't stated it's notability. I'm getting more confused with how I get this page up and running, so would appreciate as much assistance as you could give me. The page is obviously about an amateur football club in Wakefield, West Yorkshire, UK. I'm wanting to bring the article up to a similar standard of other football clubs. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobbybarks (talk • contribs) 20:11, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

• Amateur clubs aren't considered notable - see Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:18, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Regarding deletion of "GulliC"

This article should not be speedily deleted because this article gives an example that in third world countries like Pakistan there is alot of talent but due to society constraints (Discrimination) women faces alot of difficulties !To build there own identities. This young women could be another example to the world , that if u have will to do something in life nothing is impossible. Best part about Ms Khan is that she is working for the betterment of society. Encouraging other girls to work and to stand on their own feet. Pakistan is a poor country with lot of discrimination prevailing in society. NOT only earning herself but bringing a platform and--Jhk112345 (talk) 18:40, 11 November 2011 (UTC) source of income for lot of other homes. This Young Woman is working for the society and its betterment ..

The owner of the GulliC is running the brand on her own without any support. From designer’s work to the sales and marketing she is doing it alone. The economic scenario of the country and the especially the law and order situation of the country has made it impossible for a normal human to start a business. In a very short span of time she showed a remarkable growth and in a very short span of time she became the inspiration in her social circle and the institute in which she was studying. The institute was compelled to support her due to the remarkable performance of the girl in studies and the business in such a young age. The institute is one of the best institutes of the country and she is the first student who showed such excellent entrepreneurial activities. Some market gurus has reviewed her work and appreciated it. Now she will be on the TV channels soon as the negotiations are going on with few famous TV channels of the country. With approx. no resources in the start she managed to show such a performance that now her family is proud of her and now supporting her. She is offering jobs to the undergrad’s students and specially girls so that she can made some good living as well as it is very difficult for a women to work in Pakistan due to social barriers. In such a young age she felt the social responsibility as now she is the inspiration for many girls and as common women any girl can relate with her. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhk112345 (talk • contribs) 11:10, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

• It's nice that she is doing good work, but that's not enough for a Wikipedia article. You need to be able to cite coverage in reliable, third-party sources (see WP:V) that show that she is notable per WP:BIO or WP:ORG. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:51, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Sir i have mentioned the reference of her facebook page for now. where as she is notable because in a country like pakistan the work she is doing is remarkable and she will be on the TV channels soon as the negotiations are going on with few famous TV channels. if you allow this article to be posted. i assure you i will update its refrences as soon as possible and will also update the links of the TV programs on which she will be in. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhk112345 (talk • contribs) 18:33, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

• The subject's own Facebook page is not an *independent* source. When she has appeared on TV and you can cite to verifiable weblinks showing this, let me know. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:13, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Regarding deletion of "Disappearance of Shannan Gilbert"

• Disappearance of Shannan Gilbert

Why was this page deleted?? She disappeared last May and because of her, police have discovered 10 human remians found along Ocean Pkwy. It was a huge news story for many months. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Princezzree (talk • contribs) 15:09, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

• Can you cite some reliable sources? NawlinWiki (talk) 16:22, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

http://www.findshannangilbert.com/ http://abcnews.go.com/US/shannan-gilbert-bodies-linked-long-island-beach-serial/story?id=13303092 http://www.nj.com/hudson/index.ssf/2011/07/48_hours_mystery_to_feature_mi.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Princezzree (talk • contribs) 16:56, 12 November 2011 (UTC) Also, the Long Island Serial Killer is a Wiki & she's mentioned in it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Princezzree (talk • contribs) 17:03, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

The presence or absence of Article X 'DOES NOT JUSTIFY WHATSOEVER Article Y. —Jeremy v^_^v ^{Components:V S M} 17:33, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

It does justify, because of her, the bodies were found and a serial killer was and still is on the loose — Preceding unsigned comment added by Princezzree (talk • contribs) 17:56, 12 November 2011 (UTC) http://www.longislandpress.com/powerlist/shannan-gilbert/ She was also named 49 of 50 powerful people of Long Island! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Princezzree (talk • contribs) 17:59, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

• That source is enough to save the article from speedy deletion. But (1) it wasn't in the article that was deleted, (2) the article that was deleted cited only to a Facebook page, and included a plea for anyone with information about Ms. Gilbert to come forward. That's not what Wikipedia is for, see WP:NOT. If you can rewrite the article in neutral language, see WP:NPOV, and cite only to reliable sources (not Facebook), feel free to repost. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 18:47, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Has been deleted !

Hey,, before maybe 4 hours i finished my second article in Wikipedia,, but now i found that my article named ( Karim Kamel ) has been deleted!!! i can't understand why?? can you please tell me? and if i want to do another article about the same subject and the same person,, can i or not?? hope to answer me soon Thank You MoUstafa pika (talk) 21:58, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

• Being a non-winning contestant on a reality show doesn't equal notability per our standards, see WP:BIO. I didn't see any other verifiable assertion of notability. The claim of being in a major movie doesn't match with the artist's IMDB listing (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3862073/), which shows only 2 small parts and also indicates that "Karim Kamel" is not even his preferred name. Also, the article was full of advertising ("Here's the link for the website for his fans to listen to his music!"), see WP:SPAM. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:38, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For deleting the vandalism on my userpage. Thank you and happy editing! pluma Ø 20:56, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Seconded by myself. You're one of the great quiet performers here that make so many of us more comfortable in certain environments. Thanks for the note. Nishidani (talk) 20:16, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

I am back and changed

Hello. I remember you being one of those administrators that always deleted these random film articles that were created by Lyle123 and his sock puppets. Well, I am Lyle123 and I really want to apologise for that. This time, I mean it. I admit that those film articles I made were just nonsense and complete hoaxes. And I did create these other accounts so I can continue doing it and I tried to cover myself up for that. Well, now, after a few years, I've learned what I did and decided to quit for good. You don't have to unblock my Lyle123 account if you don't want to. I'm just gonna be here to edit some stuff that need changed without adding anything nonsense and at least be a respected user on this site. So I hope for your forgiveness and pretend that madness never occured. LyleisBack (talk) 18:10, 15 November 2011 (UTC)LyleisBack

• Thanks for the apology. It goes without saying that I will be watching your contributions closely. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:26, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
• Actually, I won't be doing that much editing since I have stuff in real life to do. So I will only use Wikipedia for looking things up in the meantime. Thanks for accepting my apology. Hopefully I can be more respected now that I have changed. LyleisBack (talk) 18:19, 16 November 2011 (UTC)LyleisBack

Question from User:JarlaxleArtemis

Why don't you delete all the sock puppet edits at Great power, too?

• Because that sockmaster doesn't have the multi-year history of repellent personal insults, email abuse, and sock recruitment that you do. To put it simply: You don't get to edit anything here, or have any of your edits remain in any article history. It's not because of the topics - it's because it's you. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:44, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
• Um, was he talking to me? LyleisBack (talk) 21:09, 16 November 2011 (UTC)LyleisBack
  • No, Lyle. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:10, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

You are using an ad hominem fallacy.

Judge the content, not the contributor.

• Except when the contributor is banned, like you, because of a long history of disruption. Did you ever consider stopping the use of gross insults against everyone who disagrees with you (a practice which started when you cared more about Dungeons & Dragons than Israel, and continues to this day)? You do realize that this is how we can tell all those sockpuppets are you. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:21, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

You are using an ad hominem fallacy

Judge the content, not the contributor.

• • Disruptive editing includes repeated posting of the same comment. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:26, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

In Search Of La Che Deletion

Hi, you recently deleted my page about the Scottish film "In Search Of La Che" on the grounds it was advertising. Can you explain how it was different from any other film article on wikipedia an how I can avoid it being deleted again JerryBancroft (talk) 12:37, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

• There is no indication that this film (which appears to have been screened once, at one theater in Scotland) is notable per WP:N. NawlinWiki (talk) 13:40, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Today you just deleted my musical profile page [NOA (Singer)]

Was wandering why and if you could at least send me a copy as I didn't save it. Thanks for restoring it so I could save it. What's the reason for deletion? WHat can I do to improve it. I have stated the awards given, importance to the industry etc. [NOA (singer)] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noamusician (talk • contribs) 15:32, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

whaat the

y did u delete my article (ceeps)

whaat the

y did u delete my article (ceeps) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Randomgamertag (talk • contribs) 05:04, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Version deletion

Hi,

I don't see in your contributions that you moved my request to a special page for revision deletion. Are you planning to still do that or was it your goal to keep the copyright violation in the article forever? -- Cecil (talk) 17:30, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

• Revdel'd the versions with the copyvio, thanks. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:10, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/You were never here

I agree with you that the article You were never here is far too premature and fails WP:NFF. But as its planning IS written of in reliable sources, and as policy does allow that a future event might be discussed if written of in a related article if properly sourced, might you not think my thought toward redirecting the title to the director's article is worth consideration? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:16, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

• Works for me, good idea! NawlinWiki (talk) 01:18, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for removing Jar's edits

We really appreciate your efforts in keeping the place clean. ☺ ☻ Nanoteknology (talk) 15:12, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Deletion and Username

Thanks for deleted "Prince Charles of Wellington". However, I reported this username ("Prince Charles of Wellington) to the UAA because most of the words "Prince Charles" meets a well-known living person and impersonation of a living person. Regards --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 19:58, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Dubh Linn (the Black Pool)

You recently deleted the page "Dubh Linn (the Black Pool)." It was not a duplication of the History of Dublin; it was a more involved look at the pool the Vikings protected. Everything in the History of Dublin, and all other Dublin pages for that matter, do not address "the Black Pool" as anything more than a location, and comment about how Dubh Linn means Black Pool in Irish. There is much more to this place; it holds crucial cultural significance. I was doing this page for a class project for a Celtic-Scandinavian course at my university. Let me assure you, it should be reinstated. Sincerely, BadgerRugger — Preceding unsigned comment added by BadgerRugger (talk • contribs) 05:25, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

• This is not a title that anyone is going to search for, though. Your material would work better as an addition to/expansion of the History of Dublin page. NawlinWiki (talk) 05:26, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

IMP³rove

I have noticed, that you deleted my article over the IMP³prove project, which is a project of the European Commission !!! It was written objectively and used the project's actual website. The article simply lists the history and basic approaches of the project, which is a common format when one looks at the other wikipedia websites. The article was not promotional at all and I would highly appreciate if you could publish the article again on wikipedia. In case the article needs further citation etc. please let me know! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deborah12345 (talk • contribs) 14:05, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Joe Circus sockpuppets

Hi NawlinWiki. Thanks for dealing with the User:No human rites for boys sock; could you take a look at User:Shame on Hirelings? Thanks, Jakew (talk) 18:21, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Metarelic

--Metarelic--

Could you please give me some more specific pointers as to why this article is deemed deletable? I would like to know why you think that article is self advertising/promotion? It is a neutral article about an artwork, in a gallery. I see other articles about other certain artworks, which are far less informative. The piece of art is currently being written about in art magazines, which I will be adding as references shortly. The whole point of this artwork is that is references it's self on the internet. It does this through two different outlets: one is a self titled webpage, the other is wikipedia. Does this change that it is an article written objectively about an artwork, which does in fact exist and is of interest to people? I would be grateful for any help--XavierPoultney (talk) 19:46, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

• Sorry, but that kind of bootstrapping - "the point of my artwork is that it's referenced on Wikipedia" - doesn't make it notable per our guidelines, which require it to have been acknowledged as notable (see WP:N) by reliable independent sources (see WP:V). Also, since you are the artist, you should not be writing the Wikipedia article about your work, see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:38, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Brown Thursday

You deleted my article about Brown Thursday. If Black Friday can have an article why can't Brown Thursday? Pesnider (talk) 19:21, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

• See WP:MADEUP, WP:SPAM, and WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:22, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Brown Thursday is as made up as black Friday, Google it! You will find references to Fox News Phoenix, NYMag.com, and several other sources. The term is real! I am still not sure why my entry was deleted. Pesnider (talk) 19:30, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

At least give me the opportunity to edit what you do not like about my article. I clearly stated at the end of the article I would add reference later in the day. Is there a way to see my deleted article? Pesnider (talk) 19:38, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

• See C. Fred's comments to you on his talk page. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Sneakpeeq

Sorry about posting under another article. My first post, and still figuring out the Wiki system.19:49, 23 November 2011 (UTC) Sneakpeeq (talk) 20:00, 23 November 2011 (UTC) Hi, I created the sneakpeeq page with the intent of handing it off to have someone else write the article. This is my first time creating an article for wikipedia, so please forgive the ignorance. What is the best way to prevent deletion in the future? and will i be able to re-create the page in the future once the article is written up?

• You would need to be able to cite reliable independent sources (see WP:V) to show that the site meets the notability requirements of WP:WEB. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

sneakpeeq

This was my first article submission to wikipedia, so please forgive my ignorance. I created the page with the intent of filling in more information later. Will I be able to create the page again in the future once the entire article is written up? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sneakpeeq (talk • contribs) 20:04, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

IMP³rove

Could you please let me know, why the article was deleted and what do I have to change about it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deborah12345 (talk • contribs) 08:41, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

• The article reads like an advertisement or promotional brochure for the project, see WP:SPAM and WP:NPOV. Any article about the project needs to be based entirely on what independent, neutral sources have said about it, see WP:V, and should show that the project meets the notability standards of WP:ORG. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:00, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

I reconstructed the article and added a lot of independent sources. However I am not quite sure about the way the rules and regulations are applied on Wikipedia. Since IMP³rove is a non-commercial project, I compared it e.g. to the article about the Smithsonian Institution. They used as well their own website and publications as references and linked the part about the "research centers and programs" to external company links. Therefore I will upload the revised version of the IMP³rove article and hope that it won't be deleted again, since I think that it matches all the required standards now! Best regardsDeborah12345 (talk) 11:29, 29 November 2011 (UTC)