Your submission at Articles for creation: Shivawatar choudhary (July 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:42, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
sir please tell how i can improve it
all the data is relivent sir i am the grand son of shree shivawatar choudhary and i have all the relivant books and data , i have all the books written by my grandfather( shree shivawatar choudhary) if i uplod the books pictures can you approve it as relivant source
please please let me know sir Nagpuri writers (talk) 13:54, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Nagpuri writers! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:42, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
sir please tell how i can improve it
all the data is relivent sir i am the grand son of shree shivawatar choudhary and i have all the relivant books and data , i have all the books written by my grandfather( shree shivawatar choudhary) if i uplod the books pictures can you approve it as relivant source
please please let me know sir
Nagpuri writers (talk) 13:57, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Firstly, you have a conflict of interest (COI), which needs to be properly disclosed; I will post a separate message with instructions.
Secondly, you cannot just write what you want, or what you know, about your grandfather. You must only summarise what reliable and independent third parties (mainly secondary sources) have said about him.
Thirdly, you must then cite those sources as your references. Each material statement, especially anything potentially contentious, must be clearly supported by a reference to a reliable published source.
Finally, you must write in a neutral, factual manner, without putting any positive 'spin' or other embellishment on things, and focusing only on information which has encyclopaedic value and relevance.
Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:18, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Nagpuri writers. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:18, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

sir can you write about my grandfather please by reading my one please sir please Nagpuri writers (talk) 15:33, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
No, because I have no knowledge of, or interest in, this subject.
In any case, my earlier advice still stands: you need to find independent and reliable sources that have published significant coverage of your grandfather, and summarise what they have said. Therefore your first and main task is to look for those sources.
You must also formally disclose your COI, as instructed in the message above. Please do that as your very next edit. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:01, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: SHIVAWATAR CHOUDHARY (July 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iwaqarhashmi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Waqar💬 15:30, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
sir please can you update or write about him he is my grand father
i want to show every one about him no one is giving attentions to the regional heros or persnolity please sir please Nagpuri writers (talk) 15:37, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Please understand that Wikipedia is not a memorial or tribute site, we are an encyclopaedia, which publishes articles on subjects that are considered notable and of encyclopaedic value. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:02, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

July 2024

edit

  Hello, Nagpuri writers, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Jharkhand authors (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:52, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ditto, Nagpuri authors. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:53, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Primefac (talk) 16:01, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply