Your submission at Articles for creation: Johnson Winter & Slattery (April 12) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 05:32, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Johnson Winter & Slattery has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Johnson Winter & Slattery. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 23:31, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Johnson Winter & Slattery has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Johnson Winter & Slattery. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 00:17, 13 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Johnson Winter & Slattery concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Johnson Winter & Slattery, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:58, 24 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation edit

 

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CK082n, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

-- RoySmith (talk) 14:46, 26 March 2019 (UTC)Reply