Molly2016.

Welcome!

Hello, Molly2016., and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Christopher Simon Law Firm, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Cabayi (talk) 17:13, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Christopher Simon Law Firm

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Christopher Simon Law Firm, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 17:13, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Notability

If writing about the firm, please read WP:CORP, if about the person, it's WP:BIO. In both cases, read WP:RS as well - that'd about the reliable independent sources needed to prove the notability. Please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not social media or a directory. Not every person or every business gets an article. It is also not a profile host (like LinkedIn) or a CV (resumé) host. Your article looked rather CVish in style. We aren't concerned whether someone is 'positively' represented or otherwise. We have articles about nice people and nasty ones - the criterion is that they pass the notability requirements with RS referencing. On this subject, please be aware that neither the creator of the article nor the subject can control the article. Wikipedia is 'warts and all', and information that is not to the taste of the subject may not be removed if it is reliably and independently sourced. Almost anyone can edit. (Internet access is a necessity, of course, and so is not being blocked or banned.) Peridon (talk) 18:16, 19 August 2016 (UTC)