Misswikipi

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 12:37, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:The Elgin Hotel, Darjeeling.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:The Elgin Hotel, Darjeeling.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Majora (talk) 21:57, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Elgin Nor-Khill, Gangtok

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Elgin Nor-Khill, Gangtok, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. noq (talk) 11:45, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Elgin Mount Pandim, Pelling

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello. A tag has been placed on The Elgin Mount Pandim, Pelling requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 12:06, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to The Elgin Nor-Khill, Gangtok. I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:16, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Multiple speedy deletion nominations

A tag has been placed on multiple images requesting that they be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the files appear to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think these pages should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page(s) and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The above notice applies to the following images:

1. File:The Elgin Mount Pandim, Pelling.jpg
2. File:Elgin Nor-Khill Gangtok.jpg
3. File:Pemayangtse monastery from Elgin Mount Pandim.jpg
4. File:The Silver Oaks, Kalimpong.jpg
5. File:The Elgin Hotel, Darjeeling.jpg

Please be aware that all material you find somewhere else on the web is likely to be copyrighted. Please stop uploading copyright violations. Continual violations will result in the revocation of your editing privileges. If you have any questions please feel free to ask me and I will be happy to assist you.

September 2016

Please stop uploading copyright violations

Please stop uploading images that do not belong to you. Repeated copyright violations will result in your editing privileges being revoked. Anything you find online is considered to be copyrighted. Just because it is online does not mean it is licensed under a license we can use. If you have any questions please feel free to ask me but please stop uploading images. Majora (talk) 21:37, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Birla Tyres.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Birla Tyres.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to Birla Tyres. I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:04, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of The Elgin Silver Oaks, Kalimpong for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Elgin Silver Oaks, Kalimpong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Elgin Silver Oaks, Kalimpong until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:11, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Kesoram Rayon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kesoram Rayon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kesoram Rayon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:42, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Misswikipi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am new to this i made mistakes but i am learning in here and i am not using multiple account as stated the reason i am blocked

Decline reason:

You are pretty clearly part of that farm of inappropriately promotional accounts. Block appears appropriate. Yamla (talk) 13:27, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello Yamla

I had been updating Wikipedia pages with information that was not promotional but rather facts about different companies and hotels that have been present and operating for many years. I am neither a staff of these organisation and also not related to any of the vendors working for any PR activities for them. Nevertheless can you please spend some time and guide me where I went wrong so that this problem does not occur again. As regards to my account being a duplicate ID of another account, I do use a shared Internet access that is accessed by many others so there may be situations where others are all accessing the Wiki pages at the same time. Is that a violation, since I guess using WiFi anywhere would mean a shared access and there is no way I can ensure that the other users are not using Wiki at the same time. Please advise and assist.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Misswikipi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I had been updating Wikipedia pages with information that was not promotional but rather facts about different companies and hotels that have been present and operating for many years. I am neither a staff of these organisation and also not related to any of the vendors working for any PR activities for them. Nevertheless can you please spend some time and guide me where I went wrong so that this problem does not occur again. As regards to my account being a duplicate ID of another account, I do use a shared Internet access that is accessed by many others so there may be situations where others are all accessing the Wiki pages at the same time. Is that a violation, since I guess using WiFi anywhere would mean a shared access and there is no way I can ensure that the other users are not using Wiki at the same time. Please advise and assist.

Decline reason:

(1) The amount of overlap between your editing and that of some of the other accounts is so great that it is absurd to claim that you are independent editors who just happen to use the same internet connection. (2) Your editing is unambiguously promotional, whether or not you are employed by the businesses you are promoting. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:48, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.