User talk:Mike6271/Archive 1

Latest comment: 17 years ago by ISeeYou in topic Wrong Revert

Warning

edit

Watch your reverts at Power Rangers: Dino Thunder. Somehow, you did this.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:29, 30 December 2006 (UTC)Reply


Skalskal, I replied on your talk page.  I do not understand why you warned me, then put me up for admin intervention against this vandalism in which I have not been able to find.  If you look at my contribs, I did not vandalize Jewish Identity.  It just turned out that when I clicked undo, it brought it back to an edit with vandalism in it.  I then reverted it to a further point, which solved the problem of the vandalism.  Unless I missed something, next time, please do not come here and give me a blatant vandal then put me up for admin intervention.  Thanks! Mike6271 20:30, 6 January 2007 (UTC)Reply


Sorry, I scanned your changes there, I first found a blatant vandalism (Ian Holloway) in your edit, then a further edit with a smaller hidden message from "Mike Church", assumed this was you. After multiple edits appearing to denigrate the article, I failed to realize that your edits were merely correction attempts reverting to previously vandalized portions, my bad. ---Skalskal (the actual bad edits were inserted by 204.39.48.16 ).

Okay! Feel free to check out Wikipedia:Recent_changes_patrol, as it provides information on patrolling for recent changes. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!

No prob, sorry for the YELL! in error.

Thanks! Mike6271 20:38, 6 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the userpage revert!

edit

Thanks for your revert to my userpage. --SonicChao talk 23:51, 4 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

             -No problem! Mike6271 23:52, 4 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your VandalProof Application

edit

Dear Mike6271,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that at this time you do not meet the minimum requirement of 250 edits to mainspace articles (see under main here). Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. Prodego talk 22:56, 5 January 2007 (UTC)Reply


Paul Keating

edit

Hi Mike. Paul Keating, being an article on an Australian politician, uses Australian rather than US spellings. Cheers, Slac speak up! 05:22, 7 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about that! I didn't realize that he was Australian. I will be more careful next time! Thanks for pointing that out to me! Mike6271 05:25, 7 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
That's cool. Wikipedia policy is that spelling should be consistent within an article, so if you see an article that has all-Commonwealth spellings in it, it's probably best to leave it like that. Slac speak up! 05:28, 7 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! Mike6271 05:37, 7 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to VandalProof!

edit

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Mike6271! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Prodego talk 00:58, 9 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Could be a bug that is pending a fix, or it could be other things. Make sure you downloaded and installed all the files in the zip, and that you extracted it. Make sure you have cookies enabled in Internet Explorer. Prodego talk 01:25, 9 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thank is possible (ever probable perhaps, I would need to see the source code of VP to know for sure, which I have not). Anyway I changed the name over for you. Prodego talk 00:25, 11 January 2007 (UTC)Reply


Westmar High School

edit

It really looks like somebody copy/pasted that info there and is not very encyclopedic. Corpx 02:48, 12 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree, it does look very unencyclopedic. Would you like me to remove "unencyclopedic" information from it? Mike6271 02:56, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
I added cleanup tags. Somebody with more knowledge on the article will hopefully fix it up. Corpx 03:00, 12 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Calculus

edit
I was trying to revert the edit by 74.111.152.98, but Anti-Vandal Bot did it sooner, so I ended up reverting AVB's revert. Black Falcon 03:07, 12 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Sorry about that! I have removed the warning! Mike6271 03:10, 12 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
No problem at all. I know how hectic the RC patrol is (I only started watching the recent changes 2-3 days ago: I had no idea WP had so much vandalism!). Cheers, Black Falcon 03:14, 12 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

VandalSniper

edit

You've been approved to use VandalSniper. Please let me know if you have any problems getting it working. --Chris (talk) 19:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Quick on the trigger, unhelpful to the max

edit

The least you could do was to wait for me to post my explanation on the talk page before reverting my edit and posting a vandalism warning. I'm not amused, and I'll be watching for this behavior in the future.--Curtis Clark 04:15, 13 January 2007 (UTC)Reply


thanks!

edit
 
Many thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage! Rama's arrow 04:31, 16 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wrong Revert

edit

Why did you revert my revert on Personal computer? I was reverting vandalism and you think I'm the vandal.

Here's what I did. I took out the melissa. You put it back in. iSeeYouTalk to me 22:38, 26 May 2007 (UTC)Reply