Speedy deletion nomination of Das Dunkle Land (EP)

edit

Hello Menelkir,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Das Dunkle Land (EP) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. OGfromtheGut (talk) 03:18, 29 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of In My Fragile (album)

edit

Hello Menelkir,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged In My Fragile (album) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. OGfromtheGut (talk) 03:18, 29 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Trapped in a Dream

edit

Hello Menelkir,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Trapped in a Dream for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. OGfromtheGut (talk) 03:19, 29 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Barzin (EP)

edit
 

The article Barzin (EP) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of independent notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. InsertCleverPhraseHere 03:44, 29 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Barzin (EP) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barzin (EP) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barzin (EP) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. InsertCleverPhraseHere 04:34, 29 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Notes to an Absent Lover (album) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Notes to an Absent Lover (album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notes to an Absent Lover (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. InsertCleverPhraseHere 04:43, 29 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Referencing.

edit

Please read WP:42, articles require better sourcing than you have been using in the articles you have been creating. Please provide multiple refs from reliable, independent sources that include significant coverage of the topic. Most people are not as kind as I am to do the effort to look up refs for new articles. I would recommend going back through the articles you have created and expanding them using the refs I have provided.InsertCleverPhraseHere 05:02, 29 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

All of them have references from discogs, I can reference a lot of other sources but will be redundant, that's why I just put one source. Same for the other posts of mine. It's not about of being kind, the source is there, the page was cautiosly edited using other pages that's already there and even so isn't "in accordance of the reliable sources, etc". --Menelkir (talk)

Nomination of Das Dunkle Land (EP) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Das Dunkle Land (EP) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Das Dunkle Land (EP) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. InsertCleverPhraseHere 21:23, 29 May 2016 (UTC)Reply