Welcome!

edit

Hello, Memocorp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 01:13, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

October 2017

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Strathfield Plaza has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:05, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Memocorp. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Strathfield Plaza, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
  • instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Home Lander (talk) 02:14, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

October 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Whispering. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Strathfield Plaza have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Whispering 02:34, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Strathfield Plaza, you may be blocked from editing. Whispering 02:37, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Strathfield Plaza. Whispering 02:39, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at Strathfield Plaza shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. LibStar (talk) 04:30, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

you've been reported. Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring LibStar (talk) 04:37, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

final warning

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Strathfield Plaza. LibStar (talk) 05:05, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

another warning

edit

  Please do not "take over" articles by completely substituting preexisting content with new, unrelated content without providing an adequate reason in the edit summary. If you would like to write a new article on Wikipedia, please see the Article Wizard. Sometimes, a single term can be associated with more than one topic; Wikipedia resolves these conflicts using disambiguation. If you think I've made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. LibStar (talk) 05:18, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

so you definitely have a clear conflict of interest regarding Strathfield Plaza. continue to edit in this fashion and you will be blocked. LibStar (talk) 05:20, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

October 2017

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Longhair\talk 05:31, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
you've been blocked and now you are violating Wikipedia rules again by using another account. Prepare to be blocked again. LibStar (talk) 06:34, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
 
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Thank you. Longhair\talk 09:47, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply