Melissa Bennett
|
Tetrahedral truss and space frame
editIs it always true that every spaceframe is a tetrahedral truss? I see your point that it's pretty much the only way to build a "true" spaceframe, as most "spaceframe"s are somewhat similar in shape but put bending forces into the struts. Thus they're no longer a "pure" spaceframe.
I don't think that it's exclusively true though. For one counterexample, the Buckminster Fuller geodesic sphere (the unit cell becomes unusually large in relation to the strut length.
For another, some car chassis designs. Although these are rarely anything close to true spaceframes, some are pretty close and they often have an irregularity to their layout that, while they're still using much the same "repeated tetrahedral unit cell" as the simplest true spaceframes do, they don't have the same number of struts at each vertex. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:34, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
isotropicstructures.com
editCould I suggest that you don't overdo the links to isotropicstructures.com. (I almost reverted your additions as spam, and I see that some have recently been reverted.) Are you able to cite independent research to reference the strength claims? Dbfirs 11:35, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
September 2012
edit
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. [1] MrOllie (talk) 14:13, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MrOllie (talk) 18:42, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
Lorimerlite published!
edit
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
|
Hello! Melissa Bennett,
you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:16, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation
edit You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SwisterTwister talk 01:28, 25 September 2012 (UTC)October 2012
edit Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on Lorimerlite. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Even if you patent the information in the article, that patent is null and void because by posting the information on Wikipedia, the text is released under the CC-BY-SA license family, and is no longer your intellecutal property. If you have been spending money to patent this article, I strongly reccommend you stop, as it is not going to help. If you have any questions feel free to ask! gwickwire | Leave a message 03:42, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- See WP:LICENSE and the bottom of the edit window, which states "By clicking the save page button you agree to... Irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 License and the GDFL. These licenses prohibit you from copyrighting the material. gwickwire | Leave a message 15:04, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Your recent edits
edit Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 
or 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:03, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/d, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:50, 20 August 2013 (UTC)