Welcome edit

Welcome!

Hello, MelanieBrown, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Intensive Care (album). I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Muhandes (talk) 08:32, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

September 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Kelly Clarkson discography, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. You need to use reference citations which lead to sources actually supporting the claims; you can't just borrow any nearby ref without following it and checking whether it includes the necessary details. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 18:54, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Loud (Rihanna album). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Calvin NaNaNaC'mon! 16:55, 22 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Loud (Rihanna album). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You've been warned once already about this, and you've done it again. Raining Men is the third official single from Loud. Do not change again, otherwise you could be blocked. Calvin NaNaNaC'mon! 20:53, 22 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Stop! edit

Stop messing about with the singles chronology of Loud. I saw you removed Raining Men (even though it is the third single as it got radio release) and then you added it back in again. I've warned you before about removing it, and you still are not understanding to leave it alone. Calvin NaNaNaC'mon! 01:33, 25 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Cut Off Time edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Cut Off Time, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Dance Bailalo. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:15, 4 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi Melanie, welcome to Wikipedia. It looks like the Cut Off Time article you created is an exact copy of Dance Bailalo. I thought maybe you were using that because the songs have a lot of similar info and you're planning on editing it. I would suggest though to start out creating an article in your sandbox first and get it in good shape before making it an article. The article right now could get deleted because it is a duplicate. If you don't know how to use the sandbox let me know and I can help. Happy editing! AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 18:48, 4 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification edit

Hi. When you recently edited Cut Off Time, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Push Push (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 5 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Removing Speedy at Party O'Clock edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, thank you for taking the time to create a page here. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you created yourself. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the deletion tag you removed from Party O'Clock. Please do not continue to remove the deletion tag, instead, if you disagree with the deletion, you can follow these steps:

  1. Go to the page by clicking this link. Once there, select the button that says Click here to contest this speedy deletion.
  2. This will take you to the talk page, where you can make your case by explaining why the page does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do. For further help about the deletion, you could contact the user who first placed the tag or a highly active user who is willingly to help with deletion. This message was left by a bot, so please do not contact the bot about the deletion. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 21:11, 20 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification edit

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dancing Tonight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Inside Out
Dancing Tonight(Kat DeLuna song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Inside Out
Drop It Low (Kat DeLuna song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Inside Out
Party O'Clock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Inside Out
Party O'Clock (Kat DeLuna song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Inside Out

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Problems with upload of File:Kat deluna d.t..jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Kat deluna d.t..jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 6 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Problems with upload of File:Katdelunadropitlow.JPG edit

Thanks for uploading File:Katdelunadropitlow.JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:06, 6 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Kat deluna d.t..jpg edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Kat deluna d.t..jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:23, 7 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Katdelunadropitlow.JPG edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Katdelunadropitlow.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:26, 7 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Katdelunadropitlow.JPG edit

 

A tag has been placed on File:Katdelunadropitlow.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 13:30, 8 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kat deluna d.t..jpg edit

 

A tag has been placed on File:Kat deluna d.t..jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 13:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problems with Boom Boom (Tequila) (Kat DeLuna song) edit

 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Boom Boom (Tequila) (Kat DeLuna song), please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.romeoscorner.net/2011/07/single-review-kat-deluna-boom-boom.html. As a copyright violation, Boom Boom (Tequila) (Kat DeLuna song) appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Boom Boom (Tequila) (Kat DeLuna song) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. - Jorgath (talk) (contribs) 23:46, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Fair use image size edit

Per WP:NFCC, fair use images should use a low resolution. I have seen you uploading high resolution versions of images already available in lower resolutions. Please stop doing that. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:32, 7 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Stop uploading higher resolution copies of images that are sufficient. If this continues, it will be considered vandalism and you may be blocked. Dan56 (talk) 22:08, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to File:Ciara-The-Evolution.jpg. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 20:09, 3 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you add an inappropriate image, as you did at File:Goodies cover.jpg, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dan56 (talk) 18:26, 3 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 28 edit

Hi. When you recently edited VIVA Japan Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page VIVA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:41, 28 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'm Out (Shannon Bex song) notability edit

I see you recently added a page on I'm Out (Shannon Bex song). Note that as per WP:MUSIC "A single requires its own notability, and that notability is not inherited and requires independent evidence. That a single is an officially released recording by a notable musician or ensemble is not by itself reason for a standalone article." This means having significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.

I don't see any indication in this article that this single is independently notable. Please add content to the article indicating the single's notability, preferably citations of reliable sources that discuss the subject. Otherwise someone may suggest deleting the article. DES (talk) 21:08, 5 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of I'm Out (Shannon Bex song) edit

 

The article I'm Out (Shannon Bex song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nothing notable about this song, fails WP:NALBUMS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MsFionnuala (talk) 00:50, 6 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:TheSaturdaysWordshaker.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading File:TheSaturdaysWordshaker.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 03:48, 6 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 5 February edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

June 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm Livelikemusic. I noticed that you made a change to an article, A.K.A. (album), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. livelikemusic my talk page! 01:50, 28 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

September 2016 edit

  Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:23, 17 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, MelanieBrown. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, MelanieBrown. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply