Mediolanum

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to European Union because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 14:00, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Look, you'll eventually get problems, only because you're adding a phrase that makes no sense, in whatever language. Would you try to think what are you trying to say? Largest among what? Time? Place? Both? Materialscientist (talk) 10:12, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Reply: Read what you're adding, "in 2011, generated the largest nominal gross domestic product (GDP) of 17.6 trillion US dollars" - this is wrong, as EU had a larger GDP in 2008. Materialscientist (talk) 10:28, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Eurosphere etc

Hi - I've reverted several of your recent edits as they simply are not true. The Eurosphere does not equate to the EU being a superpower. The EU is a potential superpower. You may be pleased to learn however that this article (potential superpowers) is about to be updated to give more prominence to the EU, China and India as the three 'key' potential superpowers. Just so you don't think I'm picking on the EU or anything like that!

You might want to read up on the definition of a superpower and also the section in the potential superpowers article on the EU as to why the EU at present isn't regarded as one (yet). David (talk) 19:45, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Also Mediolanum, please read up on Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch, adding words like "major" or "main" before regional power that the Italy article is considered to be improper and constitutes the use Weasel words. POV has no place on Wikipedia.Antiochus the Great (talk) 20:03, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Italy is a mian regional power in Europe.Go to read some books ,ignorant))))Mediolanum (talk) 20:23, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Read

WP:NLT before making a post like this again. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:58, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Hello, I'm Darkness Shines. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Potential superpowers that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 05:04, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 14:37, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.  Jayron32 15:31, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Clear legal threat here: [1]. If you wish to be unblocked you will retract that statement and make it clear that you have no intention of pursuing any legal action in regards to anything being discussed at Wikipedia. --Jayron32 15:31, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mediolanum, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

NeilN ^{talk to me} 06:58, 4 February 2014 (UTC)