Medhi89
Speedy deletion nomination of Annabelle Lengronne
editHello Medhi89,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Annabelle Lengronne for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Nomination of Annabelle Lengronne for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Annabelle Lengronne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annabelle Lengronne until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JesseRafe (talk) 20:05, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Waly Dia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waly Dia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JesseRafe (talk) 20:13, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
edit | This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Medhi89. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:01, 8 October 2017 (UTC) |
A page you started (Ludovic Bernard) has been reviewed!
editThanks for creating Ludovic Bernard, Medhi89!
Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
This has beent agged for several issues.
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.