User talk:Mattinbgn/Archive 3

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Dan arndt in topic Calerway

DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.

Post replies to the main talk page, copying the section you are replying to if necessary. (See Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.)

Goulburn Valley edit

  On 30 March, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Goulburn Valley, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 17:32, 30 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Nice work on the Goulburn Valley article! Kudos to you, sir! --Kralizec! (talk) 19:27, 30 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

  • Lovely article started again Matt. --VS talk 23:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

New Pics edit

Nice new pictures of Balldale, Bungowanah, Culcairn and the changed image on Walla Walla. Seems like we both took advantage of the weather today (I went out to Ganmain to take a few and will put them up later this evening or tomorrow). --VS talk 10:45, 1 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Pharmer4 edit

No probs Matt. I think he is a good editor in the making - obviously keen on country towns (just like us) - needs a little redirection but he seems sure to get there. - We need to get him interested in futher afield than Deni and maybe jump on board with Wikipedia:WikiProject Riverina... --VS talk

  • Just to let you know that Pharmer4 has joined our merry band.--VS talk 21:59, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Emmadean edit

I think notability is asserted in this article, so I have removed the speedy tag. WP:PROD or WP:AFD would be a better venue if you still think the article should be deleted. Natalie 16:33, 1 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

NSW electorates edit

Thanks, I guess I'll push on with it then.--Grahamec 02:04, 2 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

I have given permission for the temporary deletion of the Nash Timbers site, regarding the logo I copied it from the companies home page and wanted to avoid copyright infringements through the explanation, is there another way of obtaining the image and avoiding "WP:COI issues"? - onethreesix

Cricket in Australia edit

Glad to be of help. Tintin 11:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Füritechnics edit

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Füritechnics. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Haikupoet 04:07, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

New Pics (2) edit

Thanks - a bit lucky with that one - pulled up for 15 minutes to see 5 or 6 Vintage Car enthusiasts literally pulling out and thought quick-click... I had noticed the Maude pics - sorry didn't realise you weren't finished and updated the photos wanted list on the info box. Hope you enjoyed your break - sounds like you probably did?--VS talk 00:10, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

  • That was short - and I know what you mean - this damn wiki eats at your mind when it's contantly so interesting.--VS talk 07:42, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Persistent rural photographing edit

  The Photographer's Barnstar
Awarded for your persistence in reaching the far flung communities of rural NSW and beyond so as to capture an image or two for that locations mainspace article. --VS talk 03:15, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yongala edit

No problems.. It was just that when it had been created there was so little content that I had thought it might be better to delete it and re-create the article with more content, but no worries :) It is true that every town is notable just because of its existence.. Cheers! Baristarim 08:53, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Peggy Antonio edit

  On 10 April, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Peggy Antonio, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 16:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cunneen edit

Thank you for updating the references. I have tried including the sources as best I can. This person is noteworthy and deserves as complete a bio as possible. Dppdpp 02:25, 11 April 2007 (UTC) I note someone has now provided the refernce dates.Dppdpp 08:02, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

ACOTF edit

Thanks for the great work on Cricket in Australia. Bushranger has been selected as the new ACOTF, and you voted for that, too. --Scott Davis Talk 14:50, 15 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Darwin Photos edit

They're great - thank you so much! JRG 12:55, 16 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Schools issue edit

Rather than Mrs Plum or Chuq's talk pages could we take it to the Tassie project talk page - it does have ramifications - and the tassie project is riddled with one line stubs that are potential victims if ever... it would be good if we could keep it at the project page - cheers SatuSuro 03:28, 17 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cleanup templates edit

Just to let you know that most cleanup templates, like "unreferenced", "fact", "cleanup" etc., are best not "subst"ed. See WP:SUBST for more details. Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 08:57 18 April 2007 (GMT).


Deleted Articles edit

You marked 2 articles for deletion - PG SiteMaker & Memorial Solutions - I am wondering why. The articles are not adverts, but rather descriptive articles chronicling the launch and uniqueness of a cutting edge tool for building websites. One which is specifically pertinent to a niche industry and is vastly altering that market space and changing the industry. Additionally, these articles are no more promotional than many other articles, e.g. moonfruit Please respond. Techviews 14:31, 19 April 2007 (UTC) TechviewsReply

Julia Price edit

Thanks for doing the wikilinks. Just one thing, women cricketers talk about 'batsmen'. They do not talk about 'batters'. Batters is from baseball. It's not a cricket phrase. I won't change it back, but I'm pretty sure 'batsmen' is better, it's not sexist. If you look at the article Batsman on Wikipedia you'll see this 'Batswoman?' The term batsman is widely used in both men's and women's cricket. Attempts to use a gender-neutral term like "batter", or the specific term "batswoman' in the women's form of the game have met with little or no success, and are generally rebuffed by the players themselves.' Nick mallory 12:19, 20 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Riverina-importance edit

Further comment made here. Would appreciate your further thoughts?--VS talk 08:32, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have posted a copy of my further response to this question here which will explain my agreement with you in full but I take the opportunity to post the grading code I think we should use for such double assessment on your page also so that you have a copy close at hand.
{{WP Australia|class=|importance=<!-- Wikiproject specific tags --> |Riverina=yes|Riverina-importance=}}
--VS talk 12:30, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

  • Actually I thought it was probably me being slow. Anyway we begin - if I come across any sticky importance ratings I'll pass on to you for a second opinion.--VS talk 12:37, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
Sounds good - I'll have a go at the Start class then. Cheers --VS talk 21:53, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hey Matt - I have just adjusted this page in full and checked/arranged for the Bot to count our new assessments Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Riverina articles by quality statistics. I have started on Start Class and will continue once I get back from a meeting later tonight. Important apparently the Bot only counts assessments where the word class=(stub/start/mid etc) is written with a Lower case c. You may have known that already - but just in case?--VS talk 08:58, 23 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Scientists of Modern Music (TSOMM) (band) edit

Hi there. I was wondering if I could get some quick feedback about the TSOMM wiki entry that I created on 20-4-2007. I saw that you had it listed for speedy deletion yesterday -- the article at that stage was a barebones opening statement about the band. Following this I fleshened out the entry with details about the history of the band, with a detail that I thought would satisfy the notability criterion for musicians (as found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:MUSIC) -- the fact that their music had been placed in rotation on a national major radio network (10.). I also briefly touched upon the prominence of the band within their field within their local community (6.), although I was intending to fleshen this area further.

Another user deleted the entry some time today. When I discovered this I intended to query him about the deletion (as Wiki help suggests) and whether, if more information was provided and verified, it would still be eligible for deletion. However since the article no longer exists I can't find his username, so I thought I'd hit you up for some advice.

The page was definately a work in progress and was deleted 3 days after creation. Going forward, I'm keen to gather all the information together and create the full entry in one swoop so that it isn't so thin -- this way it could be judged on its merits as a complete entry. Also I was wondering about the difference of eligibility between the TSOMM entry and similar entries about music bands -- such as 67 Special as found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/67_special. Thanks in advance for any advice. Cheers Travis Tiddy 15:05, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the reply and feedback Matt.
I'll get the entry up and running in my userpage and then I might ask your opinion when it is near completion about whether you think it is eligible. Cheers Travis Tiddy 23:14, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

New Photographs edit

Hey Matt, I just want to take the time to comment on the latest round of Riverina photographs you have taken (I'm even slightly envious because I just haven't had the time to get out there recently) but getting such a big lot of them including Mairjimmy whose page was deleted by another editor because it had no image is fantastic. However then when I was about to post this message I saw the link to your Darwin Station photos and they are brilliant also. (I assume you must be travelling with work and not driving yourself up the centre?)--VS talk 23:15, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Montagu Bay Primary School edit

Well, to me - this is just an unreferenced article in need of cleanup. It asserts some form of notability in education in stating that larger than average numbers of students obtain scholarships to Hobart's independent (secondary) schools.

I think there is enough in this article which would make the article worthwhile if it was improved through references independent of the school ie from news, hansard etc such as coverage of the location of the school, the fire and subsequent redevelopments.

Honestly, any school article which is this big, without resorting to "Mr Brown is the principle", and covers topics such as why the school is where it is, as well as events such as relocations, fire and redevelopment, is worth keeping almost regardless of the school at question. If all school articles were this good I would never argue delete at AfD. Which isn't to say it's not worth establishing some sort of benchmark, below which articles which are in terrible condition are deleted - but that shouldn't then be used to delete articles which are in much better condition.

However, I am consistantly dissapointed that Rac fleming creates significant artcles with zero attempts at referencing them. This article is well past being a stub, to the point where it could do with a copyedit to introduce sections. Garrie 23:25, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Coonalpyn Page edit

Hi Mattinbgn,

Sorry for the delay in reply. Thanks for the advice, if you could give me a hand with the Coonalpyn/gallery stuff that would be awesome. Thanks, regards (Dalekerrigan 00:58, 23 April 2007 (UTC))Reply


RE: No worries, thanks for that. Hear from you soon enough. Dalekerrigan 14:04, 23 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

re Water polo edit

Hi there, re your comments, I am not too bothered by what the page is called, so if you think it would be better, or there is a wiki convention to leave it off, that's fine, however i am not sure how to change page titles?!? If you wish to relocate it, feel free.Rac fleming 06:39, 23 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Jane Thurgood-Dove edit

I'd say the murder of Jane Thurgood-Dove was notable. Mistaken identities, killers presumed dead, and a policeman a prime suspect at one stage. The current article is in a terrible state and does indeed need a major cleanup. -- Longhair\talk 07:34, 23 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I understand this is a long standing unsolved murder.
There have been other murder victims through AfD lately. Are you intending to cleanup this article?
Was the "policeman suspect" a realistic version or just something that was under investigation but was never a realistic scenario?
Garrie 04:10, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

WW edit

  • Agreed Matt - Regarding prose I will focus on the Media section first off, then move on to Recreation and Culture.--VS talk 19:35, 24 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
Regarding my comments on events - I like the way that you are incorporating it within the body itself which probably means the list section can disappear in full now or soon.--VS talk 10:53, 25 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Great work on Media to date. Sorry I was intent on doing some of that section tonight but got caught up with an editor giving me pure hyperbole on issues of policy which I was trying to redirect him on. Anyway your prose is probably better than mine ever is - so keep on chugging. (PS the difference between us on this article is pretty astounding already). --VS talk 10:53, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

  • Just to let you know Matt - I am off at sparrows tomorrow to Melb for the weekend (and to watch the Blues and the Lions). Hence no edits to WW this weekend - but back on Monday and into it. Cheers!
Game was brilliant (even despite the ending) with 35 goals kicked. Worth the trip. Good call on Wagga, other than cosmetic changes (if any) I will wait for your thoughts. I will also try to pick up Sherry's book if possible. Regards --VS talk 22:29, 29 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Youth Leaders International edit

FYI, the AfD you placed on this page has been taken down by another editor w/o process. I'm not sure of the steps to take or I would restore it myself. - Freechild 21:41, 25 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I just googled the group and found 296 hits on "youth leaders international" - with 6 different groups using the name in the first 10 hits. Googling the URL brought up... 6 hits. Nothing in the news. Definitely non-notable - I'll speak up on the AfD when it comes. - Freechild 21:48, 25 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Rennie, New South Wales edit

Can you give me a hand to keep an eye on this article. I have reverted an anon twice tonight who is putting up some pure nonsense. I have placed second warning on the page. Thanks--VS talk 11:30, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Climate of Australia is the new ACOTF edit

Climate of Australia is the new Australian collaboration. Please help to improve it in any way you can. --Scott Davis Talk 10:54, 29 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Gregadoo, New South Wales edit

  • This was a bit hard to call - Gregadoo is the site of the tip for Wagga - but on reflection and using the same parameters as we have previously discussed my answer is yes - Gregadoo is a village location that should be on Riverina.--VS talk 22:12, 29 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Goodna Neighbourhood House edit

  • Is it useful having some links included that actually improve the Goodna suburb article? I think just trying to continually delete an article is vandalism, not trying to contribute. Let's concentrate on useful improving wikipedia and the content.

Goodstone 12:55, 30 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Matt I missed how deleting the whole Goodna Neighbourhood House article is supporting helping the Goodna. When I look through the Brisbane main article the discussion is that it is important to remove red links to be graded as a better one. Wouldn't it be better to have mutual discussion on how to improve it? Internationally there is a category for community centres and it is a not for profit community centre.

How is the shorter article below?

Cheers,

Goodstone 00:02, 1 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Goodna Neighbourhood House is a not for profit local community centre of Goodna designed for the purpose of “Supporting the Goodna Community”. Located at 33 Queen St Goodna it is an easy walk from both the Goodna Shopping Centre and the Goodna train station. Founded before 2001 it recently moved to it’s new renovated and more central location in 2006.

 
Goodna Neighbourhood House.

Cite book edit

Morning - noticed the changes and happy to go that way too (am wondering a bit about increased size to article using this approach though - when such references will rarely be used again in the article?) I obviously have a copy of the book now - did you get one too?--VS talk 21:30, 1 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

  • Fair enough. I will use same system (but already compressed version). - Happy travelling. Oh BTW many copies of the book available at City Library - walk in the door and go all the way to the far end of the shelves - literally the last one on the back wall and you will find them in a snap.--VS talk 22:15, 1 May 2007 (UTC)Reply


Walgett railway line, New South Wales edit

Re- :I am a little concerned with the above article and the other closed rail line articles you have created over the past few days. I was intending to nominate these articles for deletion through the Articles for deletion process but thought I would ask you your plans first. Unless you are planning to expand these articles in the immediate future, it may not be a great idea to create one line stubs that provide no additional context for the reader that cannot be found in the title. Cheers, Mattinbgn/ talk 07:42, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

  • It is my intention to expand upon all of them, some already have been. I need a little bit of time, however. The Fulch 10:19, 7 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Loomset edit

Thanks for noticing I failed to put the correct copywrite on the Loomset photo. I understand you said the page should be deleted. I have now added the correct copywrite tag in so I removed the deletion message. If you still believe the page should be removed could you tell me the specific reason? Thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nachocheeez (talkcontribs) 02:06, 11 May 2007 (UTC).Reply

Summary of Wagga Wagga history section edit

Cheers - I will stop for a bit so that your adjustments will give us a couple of different views. I have tried to look at the content of the same section for Canberra for guidance.--VS talk 09:08, 9 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Are we done? edit

All but item 4 done now I think and that one is ongoing (and especially related to FA). Your thoughts?--VS talk 07:01, 11 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

  • Well thank you for the compliment - you get and deserve one from me also. I agree with your thoughts on lodging it now at WP:GAC - I'll do so now if you have no objections? I will be interested in seeing your new lead. Hope you have a good weekend away then - I assume for pleasure and not work?

PS I'd be very happy to collaborate on any other article with you - must be your turn to nominate one - what do you suggest?--VS talk 07:12, 11 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Darling Downs Soaring CLub edit

Hi

I am a member of this gliding club in Australia and created an entry for it in wikipedia - but it has apparetnly been deleted on your recommendation. As the reason for the deletion has also now been deleted I can't find out what was wrong with the entry.

Please can you tell me why this page was deleted?

Tks

RobHart 07:11, 12 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

RE: Notibilty of Santos Bonacci edit

That's OK. I wasn't aware of that fact you mentioned, plus I did see some articles on other people (who are probably more important anyway). Ryan R (M_3628905) 06:04, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

RE: Notability of Simon Cormie edit

Is there any way in which Simon Cormie could be remade?

Hi, Sintheg2. Firstly, I have left a welcome message for you above. Have a read of the links and let me know if you have any questions. Secondly, you can have the decision to delete the above article reviewed at Wikipedia:Deletion review by following the steps listed there. Note that I am not an administrator and did not delete that article and I can't restore it. I must warn you that you would be unlikely to succeed. Thirdly, before remaking the article, please ensure it meets Wikipedia guidelines, in particular Wikipedia:Notability (people). Once again if you have any questions about that guideline or any guideline please ask me for help or ask at Wikipedia:Editor assistance for anothe view. As the article has been protected against re-creation you will need to work on it in your user pages. Let me know if you need help with this and I will do what I can. If you have remade the article and it meets Wikipedia guidelines, once again you can ask me or the people at Wikipedia:Editor assistance for help in getting the article unprotected.
Lastly, I think it is unlikely that the subject will meet Wikipedia's notability requirements. It may be best to work on other topics included in Wikipedia instead, especially topics where you do not have a conflict of interest. I hope you stick around, trust me it is a lot of fun. Mattinbgn/ talk 09:13, 18 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

RE: Notability of Simon Cormie edit

mattinbgn, stop deleting articles for the sake of it. I am a completely reasonable person, but it seems like you do all this just to get a response. Some would have taken much more offense from your actions, you are lucky I am quite reserved.

Shame on you, mattinbgn

Pour some sugar on that, 210.50.215.223 10:03, 18 May 2007 (UTC)Sintheg2Reply

  • These editors same two people it seems/I'd suggest Matt. Watching with you. Cheers!--VS talk 10:36, 18 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • Hey you know - ownership, even of the mediocre, is often something worth fighting over for some. Just part of the beauty of the wiki-system of anarchy.--VS talk 10:55, 18 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • Mate - it's funny you should say that. I have actually been thinking the same for you. I did talk to some others a while ago about it (mainly because I wanted to be around to help out) and then decided to just wait for a while. Recently I have been wondering about it again (and you going for it also) mainly because the local admins seem to be either inundated or (justifiably) taking breaks from the rigour and they might be able to use a couple of new soldiers. What are your thoughts on entering the fray? BTW thanks for the comments on GAC - I actually enjoy doing them even though they are a lot of work if you give good commentary to those nominating.--VS talk 11:16, 18 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Joseph Ryan edit

This is a note to editors who have been proposing speedy deletion for Joseph Ryan per CSD g4: Joseph Ryan is indeed the title of an article that has been put through the AfD process; however, the article in its current (4th) incarnation is not a repost of the original article's content. A more detailed explanation can be found here. The best criterion for speedy deletion for which speedy deletion can be proposed for Joseph Ryan is CSD a7.

Thank you for your time, — Madman bum and angel (talkdesk) 22:05, 20 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Albury, New South Wales edit

  • G'day Matt. I had a great weekend - although I'd be happier if the Blues actually won another game soon. I did watch some bits of the game you went to and can understand your point. Still the upgraded G is a marvel to be at - that and a beer and a pie and you can get a little closer to Nirvana. As you know I have been trying to chip away at GA's (amongst real life work and play) and hopefully WW will get assessed soon. I didn't have as much time as I'd like to work on Albury but expect a bit of time on Saturday to really knuckle into some parts. On library books - you may just like the drive over to Albury but have you thought of inter/intra regional library loans - where your look up a book/s with your friendly local librarian and they ship it/them to you for a modest fee (three or four bucks)? Cheers to you too!--VS talk 00:11, 22 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wagga passed edit

Good news. I have taken the opportunity to add the appropriate user-box (note this style of box has changed in the system) to your talk page. Now we can move onwards to Albury more intently.--VS talk 22:32, 26 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Local government in Australia is new ACOTF edit

Hi Matt. You voted for Local government in Australia for Australian collaboration of the fortnight. It has been selected, so please help to improve it in any way you can. Thanks. --Scott Davis Talk 13:51, 27 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Mentone Grammar School edit

So who are you anyway mate? Was just wondering why you keep reverting the page back? In our opinion, and if you read the papers around the time of the occurrence in question (The Age, Leader, Herald Sun) you'll find more than enough info to show that the majority of the school really was against the changes and something to that effect at least should be allowed to be included. The school has also gained notoriety of late for being sued by a parent of a former student for breaching their duty of care in failing to educate their son correctly. Come on mate.. I know the previous edits are a bit rich but seriously, the school is a shambles and this is fact! I promise i won't do it again now that i'm on my last warning but if you are going to be the gatekeeper, you should know that the school is in deep trouble. Oh and by the way I expect a reply from you!!!Crcar2 07:48, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

  • No worries as always Matt. I agree with your sentiments - and particularly liked the response you gave the current offender. I also think there is probably some sock-puppetry supporting going on.--VS talk 11:25, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • Good move Matt. I notice one is blocked indefinitely now. The other will follow. I think that these four are socks of if not then meat puppets - User:Crcar2, User:Ppk812, User:Sintheg2, & User:Dingbat101 probably all from the School. I will join you in reporting to AIV every vandalism, personal attack etc.--VS talk 10:27, 30 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Mentone Grammar School Redux edit

Definitely a bit rich on my part... That was an awesome post though... i actually didn't think you were a real person... just like an automated computer response or something. Sorry about the name calling. Will lift my game now that i know you're real. Cheers! P.S. Do you look after wikipedia 24 hours a day? Is it like a job and you get paid for it?

I received a message from you that an entry I have begun working on (The Distillery) has been marked for speedy deletion. On trying to add a hangon tag it appears as though the article has disappeared in any case.

I will try and start again but it does appear that adding articles and having them "stick" in Wikipedia is a rather haphazard process.Afl4act 12:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

J O'Brien edit

No problem, I should have thought to check it myself, but eh, I've got a cold today so I forgive myself. Glad somebody caught it though. FrozenPurpleCube 00:02, 30 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

fr:Riverina edit

  • My pleasure on the minor clean-up. I didn't realise that they were translating our Riverina article - that's very gratifying. I had noticed French editors coming through all of our Riverina localities and I actually asked one of them earlier this evening to leave a small edit summary so that we knew what they were doing on the article without having to check it.--VS talk 10:52, 30 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Calerway edit

I've added some refferences to the article including articles from X-Press and Triple J on the band. Triple J also very oftenly play Calerway's "Loaded" and "Always Away" singles on the station during the week.

I have tried to assist in the editing of this article & provide justification as to why I feel it meets the notability criteria - hopefully it helps Dan arndt 03:54, 31 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
We all have our particular interests - am happy to help if you have any more queries like this Dan arndt 04:20, 31 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Olympic stubs edit

Hi Matt, I replied to your comment on my talk page if you have time for more feedback. Thanks, Andrwsc 18:15, 30 May 2007 (UTC)Reply