MattFullerTV

Welcome!

Hi MattFullerTV! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! SoWhy 10:59, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022

Hello, I'm Such-change47. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Such-change47 (talk) 10:58, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Johnny Depp filmography have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 14:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Johnny Depp filmography. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 14:25, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Charles, Prince of Wales shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DrKay (talk) 19:46, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Important notice: biographies of living persons

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Sangdeboeuf (talk) 01:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Stop Changing Images

Please stop changing an infobox's image without talk page consensus or justification. Try to stop replacing images with outdated ones as we try to have the most recent and best quality images displayed on the infoboxes. Also, please stop engaging in an edit war and from the looks at this talk page you have been warned before.

Lead images

Kindly stop changing lead images in articles to worse, less recent ones. If you do wish to change them you can discuss on the appropriate talk page, and when a consensus is reached you can act accordingly. Thank you. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 10:35, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at United Kingdom, you may be blocked from editing. — Czello 21:25, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

13 July 2022

Hello. Is there any reason we should allow your account to continue messing up articles, as you did with this edit? Maybe quit with that stuff. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 17:51, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bill Clinton. Serols (talk) 18:18, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 18:20, 13 July 2022 (UTC)