June 2010 edit

  Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to A Muskrat Lullaby. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 21:08, 20 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Edward Barnes edit

I suggest you use the following when writing about the composer; [[Edward Barnes (composer)|Edward Barnes]] which will link directly to his article while still appearing as Edward Barnes. Cheers! 69.181.249.92 (talk) 21:43, 20 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Some important issues you need to address edit

Hello MartyEdwards, and welcome to Wikipedia. While new contribtions are appreciated, there are some serious problems that you need to address.

  • All of these articles lack reliable sources which are independent of the subject, and several of them are of very dubious notability. Please read: WP:Reliable sources, WP:Notability, and WP:Verifiability and address this issue as soon as possible.
  • Wikipedia is an encylopedia not a web space provider for Family Audience Opera. If you have any connection whatsoever (personal or professional) with that organization or Edward Barnes you need to read WP:Conflict of interest and scrupulously follow the guidelines there.

I notice that Family Audience Opera has many more operas on their site. Please refrain from creating any further articles on them or on the organization itself until you have addressed the problems with the articles you have already created. If you need help don't hesitate to drop by WikiProject Opera where you can get advice from editors with lots of experience in writing on this area for Wikipedia. Best wishes, Voceditenore (talk) 10:16, 22 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Victor-Raul Garcia edit

 

A tag has been placed on Victor-Raul Garcia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. mono 00:10, 26 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of The Old Man Who Loved Cheese edit

 

The article The Old Man Who Loved Cheese has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, cannot find sources to meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JayJayWhat did I do? 01:42, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of The Vagabond Queen (opera) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Vagabond Queen (opera) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Vagabond Queen (opera) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 13:45, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply