MartinCZ1243
September 2019
editHello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tvoje tvář má známý hlas has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tvoje tvář má známý hlas was changed by MartinCZ1243 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2019-09-14T10:44:35+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:44, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tvoje tvář má známý hlas. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place
{{Help me}}
on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tvoje tvář má známý hlas was changed by MartinCZ1243 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.92777 on 2019-09-15T12:22:36+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:22, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editDisruptive edits at Tvoje tvář má známý hlas
editPlease stop your disruptive edits at Tvoje tvář má známý hlas. I explained my fixes in edit summaries both times, and you reverted both without a sufficient justification for reversion. Here is my latest edit summary: Disruptive revert. Fix too small font per MOS:FONTSIZE again. You can't have "font-size 90%" and then small tags inside that. Also, all tags that are opened (small) must be closed properly (/small).)
If you want to keep the small tags, you need to remove the "font-size:90%;" from the top of each table that uses small tags inside it, and you'll need to ensure that each small tag is closed properly. The Syntax Highlighter gadget, available in Preferences, can help you find unclosed tags.
Your recent editing history at Tvoje tvář má známý hlas shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Sockpuppet case opened
editIt appears that your disruptive editing is coming from multiple accounts. I have opened Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MartinCZ1243. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:14, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
March 2021
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
editANI notice
editNote: this is about you repairing some vandalism. Good luck on resolving your block!
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Editor(s) refactoring articles. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 08:55, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)