User talk:Martijn Hoekstra/Archives/2010/December
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Signpost: 6 December 2010
- News and notes: ArbCom tally pending; Pediapress renderer; fundraiser update; unreferenced BLP drive
- WikiLeaks: Repercussions of the WikiLeaks cable leak
- WikiProject report: Talking copyright with WikiProject Copyright Cleanup
- Features and admins: Birds and insects
- Arbitration report: New case: World War II
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 13 December 2010
- Rencontres Wikimédia: Wikimedia and the cultural sector: two days of talks in Paris.
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Algae
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: The community has spoken
- Arbitration report: Requested amendment re Pseudoscience case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Userfy
Can you userfy Doom10 for me? Redsandro (talk) 18:15, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
- Done → User:Redsandro/sandbox. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:49, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 December 2010
- News and notes: Article Alerts back from the dead, plus news in brief
- Image donation: Christmas gift to Commons from the State Library of Queensland
- Discussion report: Should leaked documents be cited on Wikipedia?
- WikiProject report: Majestic Titans
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Motion passed in R&I case; ban appeals, amendment requests, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Drtonyriviera
RE:Edit, what are your plans if user does not respond to your question? Jeepday (talk) 14:23, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- Depends on his further editing behaviour. I don't see high activity, so we'll be in time to stop possible further vandalism. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 14:41, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- Based on edit history it will probably be hours before another edit, you may as well remove him from AIV. Jeepday (talk) 15:05, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- True. Sombody else beat me to it though. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:21, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- Based on edit history it will probably be hours before another edit, you may as well remove him from AIV. Jeepday (talk) 15:05, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- After resumed disruptive editing, he has been given a 48 hour block by user:Nlu. If no response follows, and disruptions continues, this should be a VOA indefblock methinks. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:12, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
Just a note that you might have missed over this. He has been asked previously for sources for his edits, and he has never responded. He refuses to be engaged in any conversation and when he sees the block expired, he'll do it again. I think the 48 hour ban here will not make any difference either. Dragonfire X (talk) 22:55, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- if user:Nlu is okay with it, I'd say overturn and go for an indefblock right now then. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:59, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- I also concur with the indefblock, I left a not at User_talk:Nlu#Drtonyriviera, Jeepday (talk) 11:49, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
- I do not oppose it. I gave the 48 hour block because I think a block is needed and I didn't personally believe that an indefinite block was yet warranted, but I'm not going to say that I'd be upset over an indefinite block. --Nlu (talk) 13:49, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 December 2010
- Ambassadors: Wikipedia Ambassador Program growing, adjusting
- WikiProject report: WikiProject National Basketball Association (NBA)
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Talkback
Message added 13:09, 31 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Thanks for concern
thank you for your concern i dont know why this user: Active Banana (bananaphone, is still vandalizing the articles that i contribute in Regine Velasquez and other regine velasquez related articles, if you gonna review the history of these articles from aug 2010 up to now. this banana user editing too much the article that i mentioned. he's always putting some templates in the article even though not totally needed. i'm just follwing the editing styles of the articles such as Mariah Carey Beyonce etc. they're also considered as fan sites but active banana still making Regine Velasquez article a TRASH, instead of helping his fellow wikipedian (me) he's still making shame in his fellow wikipedian. and how can we banned active banana in edit wars? he's also in edit wars with other users in this wiki encyclopedia. thank you! and god bless! :)) Russart_1999 (talk) 22:19, 31 December 2010 (UTC)