Margalant

Margalant, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Margalant! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Richard de Clare, 2nd Earl of Pembroke

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Richard de Clare, 2nd Earl of Pembroke, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://www.gordonbanks.com/gordon/family/2nd_Site/geb-p/p101.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Richard de Clare, 2nd Earl of Pembroke and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Richard de Clare, 2nd Earl of Pembroke, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Richard de Clare, 2nd Earl of Pembroke. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Richard de Clare, 2nd Earl of Pembroke with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Richard de Clare, 2nd Earl of Pembroke saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:28, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Ref fixups on Richard de Clare, 2nd Earl of Pembroke

Hi there, and thanks for your efforts. I wish do do fixups on the refs (see the article talk page), but I see that you are actively editing. Please let me know when you intend to take a break. -Arch dude (talk) 18:15, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

• OK, I'll do it now. For a new editor, you are doing just fine and I'm impressed. We do get a bit paranoid about copyright, and it can be extremely frustrating, but I think you are working around it fairly well. I hope to show that at least some of the material is from the very old public-domain version. -Arch dude (talk) 18:49, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
• OK, I've completed the ref fixups. You might want to read the old DNB article as it appears to have the bulk of what was in new one, albeit in a Victorian tone. I took liberty of dong a few non-DNB ref fixups. I'm fairly sure we can now assert that the article no longer has a copyright problem, but I'll let the experts take a look. -Arch dude (talk) 04:53, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
• Do you still have access to the ODNB article? I do not, so I cannot comment on whether or not you have edited out the copyrighted "creative" content (sentence structure, word choice, arrangement ...) while retaining the non-copyrightable facts. We may need to get help, but if so we should ask now instead of waiting for the guys at WP:CP to do it. I have never actually gotten involved with this, because I always started from the DNB articles instead. I generally did a direct copy of the DNB article, added an attribution, and then began editing. This worked because the original's copyright has expired. the attribution is to avoid plagiarism (i.e., unattributed copying) not to comply with copyright law. Attribution will not work for us in this article, because plagiarism and copyright are actually completely separate issues. -Arch dude (talk) 02:40, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richard de Clare, 2nd Earl of Pembroke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maurice Fitzgerald (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richard de Clare, 2nd Earl of Pembroke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gilbert de Clare (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Derwin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darwin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Imogen (given name), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Celtic and Germanic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

De Clare (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Clare

House of Burke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Anglo-Norman

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sir Richard de Exeter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anglo-Norman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Vandalism

This page is subject to repeated vandalism and has already beeen commented on before by Wikipedia editors https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ernest_Shackleton&oldid=854658606 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nileobroin (talk • contribs) 21:51, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

April 2019

Your recent editing history at England shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

---

Snowded ^TALK 21:11, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your edit of Cambro-Normans

Your edit of Cambro-Normans at 18:56 on 6 November 2018 needs a citation to support your claims that "The term Cambro-Norman is rarely used even in Ireland. The Normans who invaded Ireland are commonly described as Anglo-Normans by modern historians or simply English." O'Dea (talk) 02:33, 20 January 2023 (UTC)