Mandeljulia
Welcome edit
Hello, Mandeljulia and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students.
If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Please also read this helpful advice for students.
Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.
Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, and if your class doesn't already have one please tell your instructor about that. It is highly recommended that you place this text: {{Educational assignment}} on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and aid your communication with them.
We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 16:35, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Welcome! edit
Hello, Mandeljulia, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please complete the student training, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Materials
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:19, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Exoneura robusta edit
Hi Mandeljulia. Really nice work on the Exoneura robusta article. I think it might be a good candidate to submit for the "Did you know...?" feature. I did notice though that your writing style is more like that of a journal article and less like an encyclopaedia article. Bear in mind that you are writing for a general audience, often people who have no more than a high school level understanding of biology. For example, in the relatedness among colony members section, you say
- Relatedness among immature bees within colonies has been found to be 0.439, which is significantly lower than the expected relatedness of 0.75 in haplodiploid species. This supports the observation that nests are founded by multiple females, and it suggests that these females may also mate with multiple males
In the first sentence, you lay out the supporting evidence, in the second, you explain why this matters. When you're writing for general audiences, start with the "meat" - the interesting bit: Colonies have been observed to be founded by multiple females; this is supported by the fact that offsprings are less related than you'd expect. Or, if you stick with the way you currently have it, make the statement in plain English first: Immature bees in these colonies are less closely related than would expect, if they were the offspring of a single foundress and her mate. Then go with the why: observations that colonies are founded by multiple queens, speculation that they mate with multiple males. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:55, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Exoneura robusta edit
 | On 10 October 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Exoneura robusta, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that female Exoneura robusta, a species of Australian "reed bee," will often co-found a new colony with other unrelated females? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Exoneura robusta. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Halictus sexcinctus edit
Again, very nice work on the Halictus sexcinctus article. However, I think you need to find a better source for the information supported by reference #9 - although Steven Falk] appears to be an expert, a Flickr page isn't really a reliable source for information, as far as Wikipedia articles are concerned. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:42, 26 October 2015 (UTC)