Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 15)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 12:40, 15 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I understand that my previous contributions may have appeared promotional. This was not my intention, and I apologize for any misunderstanding. I have since reviewed Wikipedia's guidelines on neutral point of view and notability, and I am committed to adhering to these guidelines in all future edits.
I will focus on providing verifiable, neutral, and well-sourced content that aligns with Wikipedia’s standards. Mama Money (talk) 12:28, 16 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi, I am still blocked can I please be unblocked I think it's very harsh to block someone on their first attempt at submitting an article. Please can you reply to my message. Thank you Mama Money (talk) 13:22, 17 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Mama Money you did not format the unblock request properly, I have fixed it. An admin will respond. Qcne (talk) 19:07, 17 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. Mama Money (talk) 08:04, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Mama Money! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 12:40, 15 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

July 2024

edit
 
Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

  1. Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
  2. Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
  3. Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
  4. Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 12:42, 15 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Pickersgill-Cunliffe
 
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Mama Money (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am well aware that I have written the draft with promotional intent after being blocked, but I am asking to be unlocked as I feel that is too harsh for being a first time writer on this platform. As I stated before this was not my intention, and I apologise for any misunderstanding I might have caused. I am not being paid to do this but add more context to this platform from my own free will. I am committed to providing verifiable, neutral, and well-sourced content that aligns with Wikipedia’s standards going forward. I will change the username and will be using this username going forward: [M.M.Y]. I do use a lot of A.I in my articles and will also change that and will add more human written content to give more individual context and information. I thank you for considering my unblocking application.41.113.121.25 (talk) 08:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am well aware that I have written the draft with promotional intent after being blocked, but I am asking to be unlocked as I feel that is too harsh for being a first time writer on this platform. As I stated before this was not my intention, and I apologise for any misunderstanding I might have caused. I am not being paid to do this but add more context to this platform from my own free will. I am committed to providing verifiable, neutral, and well-sourced content that aligns with Wikipedia’s standards going forward. I will change the username and will be using this username going forward: [M.M.Y]. I do use a lot of A.I in my articles and will also change that and will add more human written content to give more individual context and information. I thank you for considering my unblocking application.[[Special:Contributions/41.113.121.25|41.113.121.25]] ([[User talk:41.113.121.25|talk]]) 08:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am well aware that I have written the draft with promotional intent after being blocked, but I am asking to be unlocked as I feel that is too harsh for being a first time writer on this platform. As I stated before this was not my intention, and I apologise for any misunderstanding I might have caused. I am not being paid to do this but add more context to this platform from my own free will. I am committed to providing verifiable, neutral, and well-sourced content that aligns with Wikipedia’s standards going forward. I will change the username and will be using this username going forward: [M.M.Y]. I do use a lot of A.I in my articles and will also change that and will add more human written content to give more individual context and information. I thank you for considering my unblocking application.[[Special:Contributions/41.113.121.25|41.113.121.25]] ([[User talk:41.113.121.25|talk]]) 08:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am well aware that I have written the draft with promotional intent after being blocked, but I am asking to be unlocked as I feel that is too harsh for being a first time writer on this platform. As I stated before this was not my intention, and I apologise for any misunderstanding I might have caused. I am not being paid to do this but add more context to this platform from my own free will. I am committed to providing verifiable, neutral, and well-sourced content that aligns with Wikipedia’s standards going forward. I will change the username and will be using this username going forward: [M.M.Y]. I do use a lot of A.I in my articles and will also change that and will add more human written content to give more individual context and information. I thank you for considering my unblocking application.[[Special:Contributions/41.113.121.25|41.113.121.25]] ([[User talk:41.113.121.25|talk]]) 08:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

41.113.121.25 (talk) 08:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mama Money (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am writing to appeal the indefinite block on my account due to violations of Wikipedia's policies on advertising/promotion and username representation. I understand and acknowledge the reasons for the block, and I would like to address and rectify these issues.

  1. Advertising/Promotion:
    • I understand that my previous contributions may have appeared promotional. This was not my intention, and I apologize for any misunderstanding. I have since reviewed Wikipedia's guidelines on neutral point of view and notability, and I am committed to adhering to these guidelines in all future edits.
    • I will focus on providing verifiable, neutral, and well-sourced content that aligns with Wikipedia’s standards.
    • I would like to disclose that I do not receive any compensation for my contributions. My edits are made voluntarily and with the intention of improving the quality of information on Wikipedia.
  2. Username Policy Violation:
    • I acknowledge that my previous username violated the username policy by implying representation of a business or organization. To comply with Wikipedia's guidelines, I have created a new a username that does not imply such representation: [M.M.Y].
  3. Understanding the Reason for the Block:
    • I fully understand the reason for my block, which was due to edits that appeared promotional and a username that suggested representation of a business. I assure you that I will not repeat these kinds of edits. My future contributions will adhere strictly to Wikipedia's content guidelines and will maintain a neutral point of view.
  4. Future Contributions:
    • If unblocked, I intend to contribute to Wikipedia by focusing on creating and improving articles related to fintech companies and financial inclusion. I will ensure that all content is well-referenced, neutral, and based on reliable secondary sources. Additionally, I will actively participate in the community to help improve the quality and accuracy of information on Wikipedia.
I respectfully request that my block be lifted so that I can contribute positively to Wikipedia. I have learned from this experience and am committed to following Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines in all future edits.
Thank you for considering my appeal.
Sincerely,
M.M.Y Qcne (talk) 19:07, 17 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

AI written requests are not considered, we want to hear from you, not an AI. I will add if you are employed by Mama Money, you are a paid editor, you do not need to be specifically paid to make edits. 331dot (talk) 08:11, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

GPTZero has this as 100% AI and it certainly looks like a clear use of AI. Mama Money, if you'd like an admin to consider your unblock request seriously, the first thing to do is write the unblock request in your own words. Admins care about you understanding what you did wrong and expressing what you'd do differently if unblocked, not what text prediction algorithms say. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 06:51, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

@CoffeeCrumbs I am well where that I have written the draft with promotional intent after being blocked, but I am asking to be unblocked as I feel that is to harsh for being a first time writer on this platform. As I stated before this was not my intention, and I apologise for any misunderstanding I might have caused. I am not being paid to do this but add more context to this platform form my own free will. I am committed to providing verifiable, neutral, and well-sourced content that aligns with Wikipedia’s standards going forward. I will change the the username and will be using this username going forward: [M.M.Y]. I do use a lot of A.I in my articles and will also change that and will add more human written content to give more individual context and information. I thank you for considering my unblocking application. Mama Money (talk) 08:02, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I do not have authorizations to consider your unblock, I'm only giving you advice to help you possibly get unblocked. You should completely refrain from using large language models for this purpose. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 08:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
@CoffeeCrumbs I thank you for the advice and noted! Mama Money (talk) 08:36, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
@CoffeeCrumbs Thank you and noted. Can my new request be sent for review to be unblocked. I haven't used any A.I and will refrain from doing so in the future. Mama Money (talk) 08:47, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply