Speedy deletion nomination of Rumble Roses : Silly Slayers

edit

Hello Maelbros - Moi,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rumble Roses : Silly Slayers for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Xcia0069 (talk) 14:09, 19 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Daniel Tiger's Neighborhood

edit

Where are you getting your information for 2015, which has not occurred yet? ubiquity (talk) 20:42, 19 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about List of Daniel Tiger's Neighbourhood Episodes

edit

Hello, Maelbros - Moi,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether List of Daniel Tiger's Neighbourhood Episodes should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Daniel Tiger's Neighbourhood Episodes .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, ubiquity (talk) 10:41, 20 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Le Mans : A GP For Everyone

edit
 

The article Le Mans : A GP For Everyone has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No content apart from infobox: no evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 23:28, 20 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Daniel Tiger's Neighborhood

edit

Please stop copypasting large sections of the article onto the talk page - that is not how you make a Semi-protected edit request.

As it clearly states in the instructions to submit an edit request:- "Please don't copy the entire article into the request... If you copy the entire article into the request, you'll break navigation on the talk page, and another editor may remove your entire request."
Semi-protected edit requests are not a "spot the difference competition"
If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 17:11, 21 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 21 November

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 22 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:06, 22 November 2014 (UTC)Reply