User talk:MJ94/Archives/07/2011

Latest comment: 13 years ago by EdwardsBot in topic The Signpost: 25 July 2011


The Signpost: 4 July 2011

Welcome Back Muffins

 
Slakr's Welcome Back Muffins

Welcome back! Here's a fresh batch of blueberry muffins to help fuel you for your return. :P

Keep up the great work. =) Cheers, --slakrtalk / 02:29, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy

Could you please remove the speedy tag from Ismail and Junaid? I clearly stated when making the page that it is under construction. Now whenever I rmeove the tag, it keeps getting replaced :( Drspaz (talk) 04:14, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

It looks like it was just deleted. In the future, you may find the {{hangon}} template useful. It's preferred that editors use that to say: "hey, I'd like this article to stay, and here's why..." rather than deleting the speedy tag. Happy editing! :) MJ94 (talk) 04:17, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
(editconflicted) I highly suggest stating why the band meets WP:BAND to avoid speedy deletion. If you'd like to work on the article in your user space, consider creating it in User:Drspaz/Sandbox instead. --slakrtalk / 04:18, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

In other news, Kaempferia pulchra 'Silver Spot' is not a "real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content". Be careful with the speedy tags... Melchoir (talk) 05:50, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

Don't often get them. Must try being nicer to people. No, being rude is more fun... Peridon (talk) 20:07, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Bahaha. MJ94 (talk) 20:16, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Beretta A303

Hello MJ94. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Beretta A303, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. Salvio Let's talk about it! 16:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 July 2011

Why thank you

Nor did I, actually - but I tend to operate from a default position that any sort of attack on a named individual should be treated as an attack page. If it's not, it can be re-dealt with in short order. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 16:35, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Be careful with tagging things as G10, though. The description of G10 says: "These "attack pages" may include libel, legal threats, material intended purely to harass or intimidate a person or biographical material about a living person that is entirely negative in tone and unsourced." At first, I thought the attack was on this Mike. If so, it would not have been grounds for deletion as an attack. MJ94 (talk) 16:41, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
Would you believe that never even occurred to me? 'Course, it doesn't help that I've not seen the film... --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 17:25, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
Either way, it managed to be tagged perfectly. It's fine, it was deleted. All is well. :) MJ94 (talk) 08:44, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 July 2011

The Signpost: 25 July 2011